The Government Of Telangana vs. K. Ramakka

ITEM NO.59

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA

IA 66074/2018, in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). $13813/2018$

THE GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP. BY ITS Petitioner(s) COMMISSIONER & ORS.

VERSUS

P. LINGAMMA & ORS.

$Respondent(s)$

(IA No.66074/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

WITH

$SLP(C)$ No. 13814/2018 (XII-A) (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 69852/2018)

Date: 23-07-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Prashant Kumar Tyaqi, Adv. Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Adv. M/S. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

SLP(C) No. 13813/2018

The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Ch. Leela Sarveswar, appearing on behalf of Mr. K.P. Mavi, Advocate-on-record appears for all the respondents (served/unserved) except respondent Nos.1, 6 and 10. He further submits that vakalatnama and counter affidavit ature Not Verified Registry to verify, $\begin{bmatrix} 3.07.20 \ 3.07.20 \ 3.07.20 \end{bmatrix}$ update accordingly and submit report by the next date.

Respondent Nos.1, 6 and 10 have expired. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take appropriate steps in this regard within four weeks.

SLP(C) No. 13814/2018

The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Ch. Leela Sarveswar, appearing on behalf of Mr. K.P. Mavi, Advocate-on-record appears for all the respondents (served/unserved) and submits that they will file vakalatnama during the course of the day. He further submits that he does not wish to file counter affidavit on behalf of all the respondents.

List again on 1.8.2018.

KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 23.7.2018

rd