Prosenjit Sarkar vs. Lav Arunbhai Vaidya
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
2 Dec 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
p ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 20286-20288/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/04/2014 in RP No. 3036/2013 and order dated 27/05/2014 in RA No. 113/2014 in RP No. 3036/2013 and order dated 18/07/2014 in MA No. 300/2014 in in RA No. 153/2014 in RP No. 3036/2013 and order dated 25/07/2014 in RA No.153/2014 in RP No.3036/2013 passed by the National Consumers Disputes Reddressal Commission, New Delhi) PROSENJIT SARKAR & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS LAV ARUNBHAI VAIDYA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 19/01/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. H.P. Raval,Sr.Adv. Mr. Parijat Sinha,Adv. Mr. A.K. Roy,Adv. Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. The special leave petitions are dismissed. However, the costs imposed by the National Commission is dispensed with. Four weeks time is granted to the petitioner for filing an affidavit on the assurance of Mr. H.P. Raval, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the needful will be done within Signature Not Verified
four weeks. Digitally signed by Om Parkash Sharma Date: 2015.01.19 16:57:52 IST Reason:
[O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER