Union Of India Ministry Of Urban Development And Poverty Alleviation Through Secretary vs. Ansal Properties And Industry

SECTION XIV

TTEM $NO.1$

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). $31726/2012$

COURT NO.3

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

M/S ASHOKA ESTATE PVT LTD AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for intervention and interim relief and office report)

Date: 05/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. $CORAM :$ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG

• Mr. R. Balasurbamaniam, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Ms. Usha Reddy, Adv. Ms. Nivedita Nair, Adv. Mr. Nalin Kohli, Adv. Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv. Mr. Harish Uppal, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv. Mr. Tileshwar Prasad, Adv. Ms. Anushree Menon, Adv. Mr. R.K. Rathore, Adv. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv.
• For intervenor Ms. Manmeet Arora, Adv. Mr. Apoorv Tripthi, Adv. Mr. Sarvesh Singh, Adv. Ms. Herinder Kaur Brar, Adv. For Kailash Nath Associates

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Learned counsel representing R.No.18 states

that he has instructions to adopt the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 17.

Ordered accordingly.

Counsel for the petitioner states that it is not necessary to file any rejoinder affidavit.

Liberty is granted to the intervenor to address the Court, if so advised, during the course of hearing.

List after four weeks on a non-miscellaneous day.

(Madhu Bala) (Renuka Sadana) Court Master Court Master