Balram vs. The State Of Haryana

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. VIVEK SAXENA

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 3288/2023 NIMMI KAPOOR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 3670/2023 (IV-B) ( IA No.23958/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Date: 16-05-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

	Mr. Himanshu Sharma, AOR<br>Mr. Ram Niwas Sharma, Adv.<br>Mrs. Aditi Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Nitin Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Prateek Bajaj, Adv.<br>Mr. Vinay Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Lokesh Solanki, Adv.<br>Ms. Anshita, Adv.
	Mr. Rahul Jasoria, Adv.<br>Mr. Digvijay Singh Raghav, Adv.<br>Mr. Nikhil Bajaj, Adv.
For Respondent(s)	Mr. Alok Sangwan, Adv.<br>Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv.<br>Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following

O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 3288/2023

Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has filed memo of appearance only.

Four weeks time, as last chance is granted for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit.

After expiry of the said period, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

SLP(C) No. 3670/2023

Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 has filed memo of appearance only.

Four weeks time, as last chance is granted for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit.

Despite service of notice on respondent Nos. 4 to 8, there is no appearance on their behalf.

After expiry of the said period, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

VIVEK SAXENA Registrar

MG