Vasantha Raghu vs. The State Of Karnataka Department Of Urban Development Represented By Its Principal Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
6 Sept 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).19351-19352/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-08-2023 in WA No.1164/2022, 03-08-2023 in WA No.1156/2022 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru)
V RAGHU
VERSUS
STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.177499/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.177498/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.177496/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date: 25-09-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
| For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Nandakumar, Adv. | |
|---|---|
| Mr. Varun Gaouda, Adv. | |
| Ms. Deepika Nandakumar, Adv. | |
| Ms. Maulshree Pathak, Adv. | |
| Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR |
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
It is pointed out that the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore 1. District allowed the conversion of land for residential purpose vide order dated 17.10.2008/26.11.2008. Thereafter, the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore Development Authority intimated that the land of the petitioner had been de-notified by way of atur<mark>e N</mark>ot Verif Gevernment orders dated 26.06.2010 and 19.05.2014.
$\mathbf{1}$
$\mathbf{2}$ Issue notice. SECTION IV-A
Petitioner(s)
Respondent $(s)$
3. Tag with SLP(C) No.18828/2023.
4. Meanwhile, the status quo with regard to suit property shall be maintained.
(ARJUN BISHT) (PREETHI T.C.)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)