Vasantha Raghu vs. The State Of Karnataka Department Of Urban Development Represented By Its Principal Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
6 Sept 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.31+51
COURT NO.4
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18828/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30-06-2023 in WP No. 12644/2023 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru)
M/S BCIL REALTY PVT LTD
Petitioner(s)
SECTION IV-A
VERSUS
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. Respondent $(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.171685/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
WITH
Diary No(s). 34447/2023
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.179373/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $0.T.$ and $\mathbf{A}\mathbf{I}$ No.179372/2023-PERMISSION $\mathsf{T}\mathsf{O}$ FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.179374/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )
Date: 06-09-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Date: 06-09-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Ashwin V. Kotemath, Adv. Mr. S. Nandakumar, Adv. Ms. Deepika Nandakumar, Adv. Mr. Maulshree Pathak, Adv. Mr. Harisha S.R., AOR
Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1. Permission to file special leave petition is granted.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's land was already de-notified by the Bangalore Development Authority vide endorsement being No. BDA/SLAO/LAC/186/02/2014-15 dated 05.04.2014, that is prior to the judgment of this Court in Bangalore Development Authority and Anr. Vs. State of Karnataka decided on 03.08.2018.
3. It is, therefore, submitted that the said judgment would not be applicable to the fact of the present petitioner's property.
4. In that view of the matter, issue notice.
5. In the meantime, there shall stay of the possession with regard to the suit property.
6. Tag with Diary No. 9330 of 2023.
(DEEPAK SINGH) (ANJU KAPOOR)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
2