The Meghalaya Urban Development Authority vs. J. M. Thangkhiew
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
1
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28386/2015
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/09/2015 in PN No. 1/2014 passed by the High Court of Meghalya at Shilong)
B.D. MARBANIANG PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
J.M. THANGKHIEW & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief and office report)
WITH SLP(C) No. 28470/2015 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 28480/2015 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 28519/2015 (With appln.(s) for permission to delete respondent from array of party and appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report)
Date : 05/10/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY
| For Petitioner(s) | Ms.<br>Mr.<br>Ms.<br>Mr. | Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. Adv.<br>Rohan Thawani, Adv.<br>Vandana Sehgal,Adv.<br>Hardeep Singh Anand, Adv. |
|---|---|---|
| Signature Not Verified | ||
| Mr. | Anand Daga, Adv. | |
| Digitally signed by<br>NEETU KHAJURIA<br>Date: 2015.10.06<br>11:15:48 IST | ||
| Mr. | Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. | |
| Reason: | ||
| Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Ms.<br>Mr.<br>2 | Harin P. Raval, Sr. Adv.<br>Anirudh Sharma,Adv.<br>Apeksha Sharan, Adv.<br>Anando Mukherjee, Adv. | |
| Mr. Nipun Saxena, Adv.<br>Mr. Pravin, Adv. | ||
| Mr. H.S. Phoolka Sr. aDv.<br>Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Application(s) for deletion of names of respondent(s) from the array of parties is rejected.
Issue notice.
There shall be stay of demolition of any portion of petitioner(s) building in the meantime.
Further, we restrain the petitioner(s) from making any further construction in the meantime.
The petitioner(s) shall not plead equities at the time of hearing of the Special Leave Petitions.
(Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi) Sr.P.A. Assistant Registrar