The Meghalaya Urban Development Authority vs. J. M. Thangkhiew

æITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 29379/2015 THE MEGHALAYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS J.M. THANGKHIEW & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 2979/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 08/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Ahanthem Rohen Singh,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Mehta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Kshitish Bikarmia,Adv. Mr. Avijit Bhattacharjee,Adv. Mr.Subhro Sanyal,Adv. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee,Adv. Mr. Rishi Matoliya,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 29379/2015 Ld.counsel for the appearing respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service is complete. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. Ld.counsel appearing on behalf of State of Meghalya seeks more time to file the counter affidavit, but his request has been declined. ⬠¦....2 ITEM NO.72 -2- SC29379/15 SLP(Crl) No. 2979/2016 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 29.06.2016 of this Court in respect of the respondent Nos.26 & 28. Dasti in addition is permitted. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the other unserved respondents within four weeks. List the matter again on 20.09.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar

SB