The Meghalaya Urban Development Authority vs. J. M. Thangkhiew

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Adarsh Kumar Goel
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:12 Jul 2016
CNR:SCIN010344292015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

12 Oct 2015

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

Listed on 07.07.2016 Before Court No. 1 Item No. 74

SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 28766, 28870, 28871 and 29086 of 2015

LAMBOKLANG MYLLIEM ETC. ...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

STATE OF MEGHALAYA & ORS. ETC. ...RESPONDENTS

OFFICE REPORT

The matters above mentioned were listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 10.03.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:-

"SLP(C) No.28766/2015

Last opportunity for service of Respondent No.16 be taken within two weeks time and notice be issued thereafter.

Respondent Nos. 3, 5 to 8, 11 and 12 to file counter affidavit within four weeks time.

None appears for Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4, 9, 10, 13 to 15, 18 to 23, 26, 27 and 29 despite due service.

Fresh address of Respondent Nos. 16, 24 and 25 be furnished within two weeks time and notice be issued thereafter.

Fresh steps for service of Respondent Nos. 17, 28, 30 and 31 be taken within the same period and notice be issued thereafter.

SLP(C) No. 28870/2015

Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, 7 and 11 & 12 to file counter affidavit within four weeks time.

None appears for Respondent Nos. 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 16, 19, 20, 22 to 26, 28, 29 and 30 despite due service.

Fresh steps for service of Respondent Nos. 10, 15, 1`7, 18, 21, 27 and 31 be taken within two weeks time and notice be issued thereafter.

Dasti in addition also allowed.

SLP(C) No. 28871/2015

Respondent Nos. 7, 11 and 12 to file counter affidavit within four weeks time.

None appears for Respondent Nos. 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 14, 19 to 23 and 28 despite due service.

Fresh affidavit of dasti service of Respondent Nos. 16, 24, 25 and 27 be filed within two weeks time.

Fresh steps for service of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, 13, 15 to 18, 24 to 27 and 29 to 31 be taken within three weeks time and notice be issued thereafter.

Dasti in addition also allowed.

SLP(C) No. 29086/2015

Last opportunity for service of Respondent Nos. 24 and 25 be taken within two weeks time and notice thereafter.

Respondent Nos. 3, 5 to 8 and 11 & 12 to file counter affidavit within four weeks time.

None appears for Respondent Nos. 10, 13, 17, 20 and 22 despite due service.

Fresh address of Respondent Nos. 15, 23 to 25 and fresh steps for service of Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4, 9, 14, 16, 18, 19, 21 and 26 to 31 be taken within two weeks time and notice be issued thereafter.

List again on 07.07.2016."

SLP (C) No. 28766 of 2015

It is submitted that thare are 31 respondents. Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 3, 5 to 8 and 11 to 12 have not filed counter-affidavit. Counsel for the petitioner has neither furnished the fresh address of Respondent Nos. 16 and 25 nor taken fresh steps to serve Respondent Nos. 17, 28, 30 and 31. Service is already complete on Respondent Nos. 1,2,3,9. 10, 13-15, 18-24, 26, 27 & 29 but no one has entered appearance so far.

Service is not complete on Respondent Nos. 16,17,25,28, 30 and 31.

SLP (C) No. 28870 of 2015

It is submitted that there are 31 Respondents. Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, 7, 11 & 12 have not filed counter-affidavit. No one has entered appearance on behalf of rest of the respondents.

Service is complete.

SLP (C) No. 28871 of 2015

It is submitted that there are 31 respondents. Counsel for the petitioner has on 06.07.2016 filed affidavit with proof of Dasti service duly serving Respondent Nos. 1,2,3,4,13, 15, 17, 18, 26, 29, 30 and 31. Correct Respondent Nos. 16, 24, 25 and 27 have also been mentioned in the said affidavit in whose respect proof of service has already been filed. No one has entered appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 1-6, 8-10 and 13-31 though served with notice. Counsel appearing for

Respondent nos. 7, 11 and 12 have not filed counter-affidavit so far.

Service is complete.

SLP (C) No. 29086 of 2015

It is submitted that there are 31 respondents. Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 3, 5 to 8 and 11 & 12 have not filed counter-affidavit. No one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 10, 13, 17, 20, 22. Counsel for the petitioner has neither furnished the fresh address of Respondent Nos. 15, 23 to 25 nor taken fresh steps to serve respondent Nos. 1,2, 4, 9, 14, 16,18, 19, 21 & 26-31.

Service is not complete on Respondent Nos. 1,2,4,9,14,15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 23 to 31.

The matters above-mentioned are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report.

DATED THIS THE 5th DAY OF JULY, 2016.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to :

  1. Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocates B - 17, IIIrd Floor, Jangpura Extension, New Delhi - 110014
    1. Ms. Dharitry Phookan, Advocate, Ch. No. 114
    1. Mr. Prem Prakash, Advocate, Ch. No. 133

P-3/NK ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(93) - 14 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(92) - 19 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(91) - 8 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(89) - 27 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(90) - 27 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(86) - 14 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(87) - 14 Feb 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(88) - 14 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(84) - 30 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(85) - 30 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(81) - 13 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(82) - 13 Jan 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(83) - 13 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(78) - 29 Nov 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(79) - 29 Nov 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(80) - 29 Nov 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(76) - 28 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(77) - 28 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(73) - 20 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(74) - 20 Sept 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(75) - 20 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(70) - 14 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(71) - 14 Sept 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(72) - 14 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(66) - 9 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(67) - 9 Sept 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(68) - 9 Sept 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(69) - 9 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(64) - 5 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(65) - 5 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(62) - 2 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(63) - 2 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(59) - 8 Aug 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(60) - 8 Aug 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(61) - 8 Aug 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(54) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(55) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(56) - 12 Jul 2016

Office Report

Viewing

Order(57) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(58) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(48) - 29 Jun 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(49) - 29 Jun 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(50) - 29 Jun 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(51) - 29 Jun 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(52) - 29 Jun 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(53) - 29 Jun 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(46) - 9 May 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(47) - 9 May 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(43) - 22 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(44) - 22 Apr 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(45) - 22 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(37) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(38) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 1 Apr 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(40) - 1 Apr 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(41) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(42) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(34) - 10 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(35) - 10 Mar 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(36) - 10 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(28) - 10 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(29) - 10 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 10 Feb 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 10 Feb 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(32) - 10 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 10 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(21) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 7 Dec 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(23) - 7 Dec 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(24) - 7 Dec 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(27) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 13 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(17) - 13 Oct 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(18) - 13 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 9 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 9 Oct 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(15) - 9 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(11) - 8 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 8 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 6 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 6 Oct 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 6 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 5 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 5 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 5 Oct 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(6) - 5 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 5 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 1 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 1 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view
Similar Case Search