Manohar Singh Martiya vs. Union Of India Through Its Secretary Ministry Of Environment And Forest Government Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
16 Nov 2017
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.70 + 66 COURT NO.3 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 34134/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-10-2013 in DBCMA No. 250/2013 in DBCWP No. 13189/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At Jaipur) STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN NATURE CLUB OF RAJASTHAN (NGO) AND ORS. Respondent(s) ([Application for Direction] ON IA 9/2017 FOR [Application for Direction] ON IA 10/2017 I.A. 59776/2018 ā Appropriate Orders / Directions, I.A. No. 46551/2018 ā Clarification / Directions, I.A. No. 61429/2018 ā Clarification / Direction ) WITH C.A. No. 9703-9706/2013 (XVII) SLP(C) No. 34811/2013 (XV) C.A. No. 3283/2018 (XVII) W.P. (C) No. 994/2018 (For ex parte ad interim relief and exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 24-08-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, Adv. Mr. Shyam Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Sanjana Saddy, Adv. Rajasthan Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv. Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Digitally signed by SANJAY KUMAR Date: 2018.08.27 17:24:16 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
Mr. Yashvardhan, Adv.
1
Mr. Puneet Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Merusagar Samantaray, AOR | ||
---|---|---|
Mr. Nikilesh Ramachandran, AOR<br>Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Navdeep Jain, Adv. | ||
For Respondent(s) | Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG<br>Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Adv.<br>Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, Adv.<br>Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR | |
CPCB | Mr. Vijay Panjwani, AOR | |
Dr. | Surender Singh Hooda, AOR<br>Mr. Vaibhav Verma, Adv.<br>Mr. Aditya Hooda, Adv. | |
R-2 | Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Harish Pandey, AOR<br>Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Adv. | |
Rajasthan | Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Adv.<br>Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG<br>Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv.<br>Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv.<br>Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR | |
Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR | ||
Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Anand Varma, AOR<br>Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat, Adv.<br>Ms. Shubhanghi Jain, Adv.<br>Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Adv. | ||
Odisha | Mr. Sanjeeb Panigrahi, AOR | |
Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, AOR | ||
Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, AOR | ||
UPPCB | Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR<br>Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv. | |
Nagaland | Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AOR<br>Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Z.H. Isaac Haiding, Adv.<br>Ms. Nandini Singla, Adv. |
Mr. Ritesh Khatri, AOR | |
---|---|
Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, AOR | |
Ms. Rachana Srivastava, AOR | |
Sikkim | Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv.<br>Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv.<br>Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv.<br>Ms. Simran Jeet, Adv.<br>For M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co. |
Haryana | Mr. Anil Grover, AAG<br>Mr. Satish Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR |
Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, AOR | |
Ms. Shibani Ghosh, AOR | |
U.P. | Mrs.<br>Rachna Gupta, AOR<br>Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Adv. |
W.B. | Mr. Suhaan Mukerji, Adv.<br>Mr. Harsh Hiroo Gursahani, adv.<br>Ms. Astha Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhishek Manchanda, Adv.<br>Ms. Kajal Dalal, Adv.<br>For M/S. PLR Chambers And Co. |
A&N | Mrs. G. Indira, Adv.<br>Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Adv.<br>Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
List the matters for final disposal after six weeks.
Convenience volume be filed by respondent No.1 in the meanwhile.
The High Court is at liberty to proceed with the matters pending before it.
I.A. 9 (Bajri Lease Letters of Intent Holders Welfare Society)
Liberty to file additional affidavit.
W.P. (C) No. 994/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the National Green Tribunal with the prayers made in the writ petition.
Leave and liberty granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (KAILASH CHANDER) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER