The State Of West Bengal vs. Arpita Roy (Samanta)

1

TTEM NO. $7$ COURT NO.1 SECTION XVI

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15163/2009

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/10/2008 in WP No. 4107/2006 passed by the High Court Of Calcutta)

SWAMI DHYANANANDA P.T.T.INST.& ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

AMAR SETH & ORS.

Respondent(s)

(With appln. (s) for directions, intervention, interim relief and <pre>office report)</pre>

WITH

SLP(C) No. $28977/2009$ (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. $24234/2010$ (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. $16767/2011$ (With appln.(s) for substituted service, for addition of parties in the array of parties, intervention, Interim Relief and Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 16768/2011 (With appln.(s) for intervention, substituted service and appln. for de-tagging and Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 16781/2011 (With appln.(s) for impleadment, substituted service, Interim Relief and Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 16924/2011 (With appln.(s) for substituted service and Interim Relief and Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 16929/2011 Synaphylieth appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Digital Scheduler Parkers of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State o Date: 2016-00<br>18:00:03 IST<br>Peason: SLP(C) No. $16936/2011$ (With appln.(s) for substituted service, Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 17118/2011 (With appln.(s) for impleadment, substituted service, Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 233/2013 (With appln.(s) for delinking the petition, directions and Office Report) Date : 19/08/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For the Parties : Mr. Anip Sachthey,Adv. Ms. Shagun Matta, Adv. Ms. Hancy Wadhwa, Adv. Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Adv. Mr. Rohit Dutta, Adv. Ms. Sweety Chattopadhayaya, Adv. Mr. Amit Pawan,Adv. Mr. Avijit Bhattacharjee,Adv. Ms. Upma Shrivastava, Adv. Mr. Dibakar Borah, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania,Adv. Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Adv. Mr. Rohit Dutta, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv. Mr. Kunal Chatterji,Adv. Mr. Gopal Singh,Adv. Mr. Pijush K. Roy, Adv. Ms. Kakali Roy, Adv. Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. S. K. Bhattacharya,Adv. Mr. Niraj Bobby Paonam, Adv. Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv. Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Jain, Adv.

3

Ms. Abha Jain,Adv. Mr. Arup Banerjee,Adv. Mr. Bijan Kumar Ghosh,Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick,Adv. Ms. Anamika, Adv. Mr. S.D. Singh, Adv. Ms. Bharti Tyagi, Adv. Mr. K.L. Janjani, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguly, Adv. Mr. Shibashish Misra, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Both sides would agree that in view of the subsequent development that has taken place during the pendency of the special leave petitions, in our view, nothing survive in these special leave petitions for our consideration and decision and, therefore, the special leave petitions are disposed of as having become unnecessary.

As a sequel to the above, all pending interlocutory applications are also disposed of.

(Neetu Khajuria) Sr.P.A. (Vinod Kulvi) Assistant Registrar