The State Of West Bengal vs. Arpita Roy (Samanta)

JITEM NO.16 & 58 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15163/2009 (From the judgement and order dated 01/10/2008 in WP No. 4107/2006 of The HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA) SWAMI DHYANANANDA P.T.T.INST.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS TULSHI BAKSHI & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for directions,impleadment and prayer for interim relief and office report ) WITH SLP(C) NO.28977/09 (With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date: 25/01/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMA HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar P. Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jaydip Kar, Adv. Mr. Saikat Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Adv. For Mr. Goodwill Indeevar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pijush K. Roy, Adv. For Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Kalyan Kr. Bandopadhyay, Sr. Adv. Mr. Paartha Sarathi Deb Barman, Adv. Ms. Amitabrata Roy, Adv. Ms. Tanushree Mukherjee, Adv. For Mrs Sarla Chandra ,Adv Mr. L. Nageshwar Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma ,Adv Ms. Neelam Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kant, Adv. For Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv. -2- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent no.1 is reported dead. Petitioner is not proposing to substitute LRs. Learned counsel for the petitioner requested to delete the unserved respondents from the array of parties. Respondents whom notice have not been served, they are

directed to be deleted from the array of parties.

Issue notice in I.A.Nos. 3 & 4.

List after four weeks.

(R.K. Dhawan) (Veera Verma) Court Master Court Master