The State Of West Bengal vs. Arpita Roy (Samanta)
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28977/2009 STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS TULSHI BAKSHI & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report ) WITH SLP(C)NOS.9877, 16851 AND 24234 OF 2010 Date: 10/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Mohit Paul,adv. Mr. Anip Sachthey,Adv. Mr.Sarad Kumar Singhania,adv. Mr.Abhijit Sengupta,adv. Mr.Amit Pawan,adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gopal Singh,Adv. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli ,Adv Mr. Anip Sachthey,Adv. Mr.Amit Pawan,adv. Ms.Maitrayee Banerjee,adv. Mr.Kunal Chatterji,adv. Mr.Avijit Bhattacharjee,adv. Mr.Shekhar Kumar,adv. Ms.Saimina Shekh,adv. Mr.Shibashish Misra,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
contd....2
ITEM NO.19 -2-
In SLP(C) No.16851/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner is ready with the copy of the pleadings and served on the counsel for respondent(wrongly mentioned in the earlier order as counsel for the State). The copy is received by the respondent. Respondent is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit.
Applicant in the Intervention applications submits that even now the Intervention applications have not been processed in spite of my previous orders. Office is directed to process the previous Intervention applications in the meanwhile.
List the matter on 5.12.2012.
| | |(Sunil Thomas) | | | |Registrar |
SB