The State Of West Bengal vs. Arpita Roy (Samanta)

ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XVI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).28977/2009

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

TULSHI BAKSHI & ORS. Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )) WITH SLP(C)NOS.9877, 16851 AND 24234 OF 2012

Date: 09/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Ms.Shagun Matta,adv. Mr. Anip Sachthey,Adv. Mr.Sarad Kumar Singhania,adv.

Mr.B.P.Yadav,adv. Mr.Abhijit Sengupta,adv. Mr.Amit Pawan,adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr.Amitesh Kumar,adv. Mr. Gopal Singh,Adv. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli ,Adv Mr.Anip Sachthey,adv.

Ms.Maitrayee Banerjee,adv. Mr.Kunal Chatterji,adv.

Mrs.Sarbani Kar,adv. Mr.Avijit Bhattacharjee,adv. Mr.Shekhar Kumar,adv. Mr.Shibashish Misra,adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

ITEM NO.5 -2-

contd....2

Ld. Counsel representing Mr.Anip Sachthey submits that a copy of the Intervention application has been received. This is recorded. In the light of above, office to process the intervention application.

Ld.counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 in SLP(C) Nos.16581 and 24234/10 submits that the copy of the SLP has not been received by him. Petitioner is directed to serve copy within two weeks and file proof. The respondent shall file the proof within four weeks thereafter. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents.

List the matter on 21.08.2012.

| | |(Sunil Thomas) | | | |Registrar |

z

SB