The State Of West Bengal vs. Arpita Roy (Samanta)
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16781/2011
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
MOBIUL KARIM & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With prayer for interim relief and office report )
WITH SLP(C) NO. 16767 of | 2011 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(With prayer for interim | relief and office report) | |||
SLP(C) NO. 16768 of 2011 | ||||
(With prayer for interim | relief and office report) | |||
SLP(C) NO. 16924 of 2011 | ||||
(With prayer for interim | relief and office report) | |||
SLP(C) NO. 16929 of 2011 | ||||
(With prayer for interim | relief and office report) | |||
SLP(C) NO. 16936 of 2011 | ||||
(With prayer for interim | relief and office report) | |||
SLP(C) NO. 17118 of 2011 | ||||
(With prayer for interim | relief and office report) | |||
Date: 09/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.
- For Petitioner(s) Ms. Shagun Matta,Adv. Mr. Anip Sachthey,Adv.
- Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma,Adv.
- For Respondent(s) Ms. Amitabrata Roy,Adv. Mr. Arup Banerjee,Adv.
- Mr. Bijan Kumar Ghosh,Adv.
- Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania,Adv.
- Mr. Kunal Chatterji,Adv. Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee,Adv.
Item No.43 : 2 :
..2/-
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In all the above cases service remains incomplete. The contesting respondents submit that the petitioner is not taking effective steps to serve notice on the respondents and they may consider possibility of service of notice through publication considering the innumerable number of respondents. It is further pointed out that effective steps can be taken out through the District Court also. Office to verify as to whether the unserved respondents are officials or not so that notice can be served through standing counsel In the meanwhile, petitioner may consider the option of alternative effective arrangement.
It is submitted that applications for impleadment are
pending. Office to process it in accordance with Rule. In the meanwhile, all the served respondents may file counter affidavit, if any.
List the matters on 24.2.2012.
(SUNIL THOMAS) s Registrar