The State Of West Bengal vs. Arpita Roy (Samanta)
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15163/2009 SWAMI DHYANANANDA P.T.T.INST.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS TULSHI BAKSHI & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for directions,impleadment and prayer for interim relief and office report )) WITH SLP(C) NO. 28977 of 2009 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 9877 of 2010 (With office report) Date: 05/08/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Goodwill Indeevar,Adv. Mrs.M.Indirani,Adv. Mrs Sarla Chandra Mr.B.P.Yadav,Adv. Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma For Respondent(s) Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr.Pijush K.Roy,Adv. Mr.Gaurav Jain,Adv. Mr.B.P.Yadav,Adv. Mr. Gopal Singh ,Adv Mr.Amitesh Kumar,Adv. Mrs Sarla Chandra ,Adv Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma ,Adv contd....2 : 2 : UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
In SLP(C) No.15163/09 the petitioner is granted two weeks time as last chance for curing the defects. Issue notice. Await return of notice. Mr.D.B.Vohra,Advocate has not filed proof of service on the application for impleadment. Granted two weeks time for taking steps.
In SLP(C) No.28977/09 await return of notice to the unserved respondents. Served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter.
In SLP(C) No.9877/10 process is seen filed on 4th August,10. Issue notice. It is reported that Respondent Nos.69 and 80 are not yet served. Issue notice to Respondent Nos.69 and 80. In the case of respondents who have been returned with an endorsement that "not served". Petitioner is granted four weeks time for taking fresh steps by registered post acknowledgement due. Await return of notice of all respondents.
List the matter on 29.09.2010.
(Sunil Thomas) Registrar