Rajesh Gaurishankar Poddar vs. Union Of India

ITEM NO.48

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 705/2022

ASHOK PRANJIVAN BOSMIYA

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.123731/2022-STAY APPLICATION)

WITH

W.P.(C) No. 703/2022 (PIL-W) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.123717/2022-STAY APPLICATION)

$W.P.(C)$ No. 726/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.126784/2022-STAY APPLICATION)

$W.P.(C)$ No. 696/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.122914/2022-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS)

<u>W.P.(C) No. $729/2022$ (X)</u> (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.128758/2022-STAY APPLICATION)

$W.P.(C)$ No. 683/2022 (PIL-W) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.121609/2022-EX-PARTE STAY)

$W.P.(C)$ No. 733/2022 (PIL-W) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.127274/2022-STAY APPLICATION)

<u>W.P.(C) No. $724/2022$ (X)</u> (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.126580/2022-STAY APPLICATION)

$W.P.(C)$ No. 670/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.120269/2022-EX-PARTE STAY)

W.P.(C) No. $666/2022$ (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.119436/2022-EX-PARTE STAY)

W.P.(C) No. $707/2022$ (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.124383/2022-EX-PARTE STAY) Signature Not Verified $\mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \times$ 16.57:41<br>Reasor FOR ADMISSION and IA No.125646/2022-STAY APPLICATION)

$W.P.(C)$ No. 717/2022 (PIL-W) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.125877/2022-STAY APPLICATION)

COURT NO.11

SECTION X

Respondent(s)

W.P.(C) No. 736/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.127787/2022-EX-PARTE AD-INTERIM RELIEF)

W.P.(C) No. 720/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.126236/2022-STAY APPLICATION)

W.P.(C) No. 754/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.130302/2022-STAY APPLICATION)

Date : 09-09-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI

	For Parties	Mr. Sandeep S. Ladda, Adv.
		Mr. Apoorv Shukla, AOR
		Mr. Puneet Chahar, Adv.
		Ms. P. Farsaiya, Adv.
		Ms. Ishita Farsaiya, Adv.
		Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Adv.
		Mr. Tadimalla Bhaskar Gowtham, Adv.
		Mr. Aman Shukla, Adv.
		Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, Adv.
		M. Chandrakanth Reddy, Adv.
		Mr. Gopal Jha, AOR
		Mr. Anshuman Srivastava, AOR
		Mr. Shivam Shukla, Adv.
		Mr. Ritin Rai, Sr. Adv.
		Mr. Sushil Satrawala, Adv.
		Dr. Sushil Gupta, Adv.
		Mr. Ashok Goyal, Adv.
		Mr. Naveen Sharma, Adv.
		Mr. Rishi Singhal, Adv.
		Mr. Manan Verma, AOR
		Mr. Jose Abraham, AOR
		Mr. Kunal Kanunga, Adv.
		Mr. Siddharth Handa, Adv.
		Mr. Nishant Chothani, Adv.
		Ms. Tanushree Sogani, Adv.
		Mr. Atishay Jain, Adv.
		Ms. Shubhangi Arora, Adv.
		Mr. Sarthak Ghonkrokta, AOR

Mr. S. S. Ray, Adv. Mr. Pawan Shukla, Adv. Ms. Praveena Gautam, AOR M/S. Udit Kishan And Associates, AOR Mr. Rishi K. Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Ms. Ritu Arora, Adv. Mr. Piyush Vatsa, Adv. Mr. Yurti Anand, Adv. Mr. Abinash Ankit, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar - I, AOR Mr. Akshay Goel, Adv. Mr. Udit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Pulkit Deora, Adv. Mr. Harsh Gurbani, Adv. Mr. Anup Jain, Adv. Mr. Vyom Chaturvedi, Adv. Ms. Prachi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Percival Billmoria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shiv Shankar Panicker, Adv. Ms. Shrishti Thukral, Adv. Ms. Rachita Sood, Adv. Mr. Kaustabh Prakash, Adv. Mr. Ankit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Satvik Issar, Adv.

Ms. Kavita Jha, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

It is submitted that the issues involved in these writ petitions are similar and akin to those involved in other petitions pending in this Court questioning the validity of Sections 95(1), 96(1), 97(5), 99(1), 99(2). 99(4), 99(5), 99(6) and 100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, wherein notices have been issued with interim orders.

Issue notice, returnable in six weeks.

Tag with W.P. (C) No. 307 of 2022.

3

In the meanwhile, petitioner(s) shall not transfer, alienate, encumber or dispose of any of their assets or legal rights or beneficial interest therein; and the Resolution Professional shall not proceed with filing of the report. If the report has been filed, the same shall not be acted upon.

(SNEHA DAS) (RANJANA SHAILEY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)