Rajesh Gaurishankar Poddar vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO. $2+27+28$
COURT NO.12
SECTION X
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 149/2022
VYOMESH SHAH
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
(IA No. 32033/2022 - STAY APPLICATION)
WITH
Diary No(s). 18674/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.102102/2022-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.102099/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)
$W.P.(C)$ No. 530/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.96862/2022-EX-PARTE STAY)
W.P.(C) No. $528/2022$ (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.96664/2022-EX-PARTE STAY)
$W.P.(C)$ No. 541/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.99151/2022-EX-PARTE STAY)
W.P.(C) No. 559/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.101341/2022-STAY APPLICATION)
$W.P.(C)$ No. 551/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.100597/2022-STAY APPLICATION)
W.P.(C) No. 567/2022 (PIL-W) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.102376/2022-STAY APPLICATION)
W.P.(C) No. $578/2022$ (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.103492/2022-STAY APPLICATION)
$W.P.(C)$ No. 570/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.102576/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT) Signature Not Verified
No. $560/2022$ (X) 15:11:36<sup>IS</sup>OR ADMISSION)
$W.P.(C)$ No. 583/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.105542/2022-STAY APPLICATION)
Respondent $(s)$
W.P.(C) No. 582/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.105512/2022-STAY APPLICATION) WITH
W.P.(C) No. 596/2022 (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.108298/2022-STAY APPLICATION )
WITH
W.P.(C) No. 590/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.107096/2022-EX-PARTE STAY)
WITH
W.P.(C) No. 597/2022 (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.108350/2022-STAY APPLICATION )
WITH
W.P.(C) No. 600/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.109112/2022-STAY APPLICATION)
Date : 05-08-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA
For Parties | Mr. Nikhil Nayyar S., Adv.<br>Ms. Krutika Raghavan, Adv.<br>Mr. T. V. S. Raghavendra Sreyas, AOR<br>Mrs. Gayatri Gulati Sreyas, Adv.<br>Mr. Siddharth Vasudev, Adv. |
---|---|
Mr. Divyanshu Rai, Adv. | |
Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr. Adv. | |
Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. | |
Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. | |
Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya, Adv. | |
Ms. Pracheta Kar, Adv. | |
Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR | |
Ms. Eshna Kumar, Adv. | |
Mr. Udit Gupta, Adv. | |
Mr. Anup Jain, Adv. | |
Mr. Pulkit Tare, AOR | |
Mr. Akshay Goel, Adv. | |
Ms. Prache Gupta, Adv. | |
Mr. Sheshodari Naidu, Sr. Adv. | |
Mr. Ssahel Sood, Adv. | |
Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, AOR |
Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajat Sehgal, AOR Mr. Ali Murtuza, Adv. Mr. Prateek S., Adv. Mr. K. Parameshwar, AOR Ms. A Sregurupriya, Adv. Mr. M.V. Mukunda, Adv. Mr. Gopal Sankarnarayan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Shivani Vij, Adv. Mr. NPS Chawla, Adv. Mr. Suresh Kant B., Adv. Ms. Mahima Shekhawat, Adv. Mr. Nitin Mishra, AOR Mr. Alok Dhir, Adv. Ms. Varsha Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Palash Singhai, Adv. Mr. Karan Batura, AOR Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Puja Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kunal Sachdeva, Adv. Mr. Chowdhary Zulfikar Ali, Adv. Ms. Mahima Ahuja, Adv. Parkhayat Gargasya, Adv. M/S. Kings And Alliance Llp , AOR Mr. Salvador Santosh Rebello, AOR Mr. G.P. Madaan, Adv. Mr. Aditya Madaan, Adv. Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Vardhan, Adv. Mr. Harimohan N, Adv. Ms. Aishwarya Adlakha, Adv. Ms. Pooja M. Saigal, Adv. Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee, AOR Anshul Bajaj, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ritwika Nanda, Adv. Mr. Gaichangpou Gangmei, Adv. M/S. Trust Legal, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
It is submitted that the issues involved in these writ petitions are similar and akin to those involved in other petitions pending in this Court questioning the validity of Sections 95(1), 96(1), 97(5), 99(1), 99(2), 99(4), 99(5), 99(6) and 100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, wherein notices have been issued with interim orders.
Issue notice, returnable in six weeks.
Tag with W.P. (C) No. 307 of 2022.
In the meanwhile, petitioner(s) shall not transfer, alienate, encumber or dispose of any of their assets or legal rights or beneficial interest therein; and the Resolution Professional shall not proceed with filling of the report. If the report has been filed, the same shall not be acted upon.
(SHRADDHA MISHRA) (RANJANA SHAILEY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)