Anwar vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble A.S. Bopanna, Hon'ble Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Stage:
BAIL MATTERS
Remarks:
Disposed off
Listed On:
11 Mar 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
168893/2023,168894/2023,168895/2023,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.7 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 10483/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-05-2023 in CRMBA No. 9562/2022 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)
ANWAR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondent(s)
IA No. 168893/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 168894/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 168895/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 03-11-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Aarif Ali, Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Pankaj Tiwari, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Mujahid Ahmad, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Syed K Ali, Adv. | ||
| Ms. Shikha Bhargava, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Chand Qureshi, AOR | ||
For Respondent(s) Ms. Garima Prashad, Sr. Adv. Mr. Namit Saxena, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned AAG for the respondent-State and perused the petition Digitally signed by Nisha Khulbey Date: 2023.11.03 16:36:16 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
papers.
Though, contentions have been urged with regard to the nature of allegations made against the petitioner herein, at this stage, it is unnecessary to advert to the same since the learned AAG would point out that all witnesses on behalf of the prosecution have been examined and the trial is almost at the stage of completion.
It is in that view, we see no reason to entertain the instant petition at this stage.
Needless to mention that the trial shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and if, for any reason, the trial is not completed/proceeded in an expeditious manner, the petitioner herein, would have the liberty to avail his legal remedies in accordance with law.
With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of along with the pending application(s), if any.