Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd vs. Arun Kumar Mishra

1 ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO(S). 30129/2016 (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 28/09/2016 IN SB NO. 23459/2016 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH) UTTAR PRADESH STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS ARUN KUMAR MISHRA AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) [WITH APPLN.(S) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND PERMISSION TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL DOCUMENT(S) AND INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE REPORT] Date : 23/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. V.K. Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kavin Gulati, Sr. Adv. Ms. Rachira Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shishir Deshpande, Adv. Ms. Mona Sinha, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Siddharth Dave, Adv. Mr. Manu Nair, Adv. Mr. Ishan Gaur, Adv. Mr. S. S. Shroff, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Adv. 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment and O.T. is granted. Permission to submit additional documents is granted. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order. [VINOD LAKHINA] COURT MASTER [ASHA SONI] COURT MASTER [SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE] 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11151 OF 2016 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.30129/2016] UTTAR PRADESH STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ...APPELLANT VERSUS ARUN KUMAR MISHRA AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 7 th November, 2016 a representation has been filed by the respondent No.1 ⬠ Arun Kumar Mishra and thereafter an Office Order dated 22 nd November, 2016 has been passed allocating work to the said respondent. 3. We have perused the Office Order

dated 22 nd November, 2016. In view of the aforesaid order, the present appeal need not be answered any further. The 2 proceedings shall stand closed in terms of the order dated 22 nd November, 2016. 4. We have also heard the learned counsel for the intervener. We grant liberty to the intervener to make a mention of the case in the event the respondent No.1 ⬠Arun Kumar Mishra misconducts himself in any manner in the discharge of his duties assigned to him by order dated 22 nd November, 2016, which order will govern the proceedings for the present. 5. Consequently and in the light of the above the order of the High Court is set aside and the appeal is disposed of in the above terms. ....................,J. (RANJAN GOGOI) ...................,J. (N.V. RAMANA) NEW DELHI NOVEMBER 23, 2016