Ashok Shankarrao Ambadare vs. Collector Yavatmal
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Bela M. Trivedi, Hon'ble R. Mahadevan
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [2]
Listed On:
23 Jul 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
200517/2022,200518/2022,60287/2023,60289/2023,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).5668/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-07-2022 in WP No.5038/2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Nagpur)
ASHOK SHANKARRAO AMBADARE & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
COLLECTOR YAVATMAL & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 60289/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 200518/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 60287/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES and IA No. 200517/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 23-07-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.
- CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Devesh Tripathi, Adv. Ms. Pragya Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Mukteshwar Nath Dubey, Adv. Mr. Faraz Anees, Adv. Ms. Epsita Agastya, Adv. Mr. Kartik Vashisht, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ashish Parashar, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. Ms. Jagriti Pandey, Adv. Mr. Shanthanu, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. Ms. Preet S. Phanse, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Dubey, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Sakhardande, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajat Joseph, AOR Mr. Hrishikesh Chitaley, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kari Singh, Adv. Mr. Kaustubh Kadasne, Adv. Digitally signed by RAVI ARORA Date: 2024.07.24 11:00:54 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that according to his information, the SDO has already passed the order after the remand of the matter by the High Court and, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. However, he would like to place the same on record.
2. List after two weeks.
(RAVI ARORA) (MAMTA RAWAT)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)