The State Of Punjab Punjab State Electricity Board Chairman/Secretary vs. Jay Bee Industries Proprietor

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 4041/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/05/2015 in FAO No. 547/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S. NUCON POWER CONTROL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 4346/2016 (With (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 4353/2016 (With (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 4382/2016 (With (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 4037/2016 (With (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 06/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jayant K. Sud, Adv. Mrs. Priya Puri,Adv. For Respondent(s) Signature Not Verified Mr. Gurukrishna Kumar, Sr. Adv. Digitally signed by DEEPAK MANSUKHANI Date: 2016.05.07 Mr. S. Hariharan, Adv. Mr. Vikash Singh,Adv. 10:13:32 IST Reason: -2- Mr. Pradeep Kant, Sr. Adv. Mr. Divyanshu Sahay, Adv. Ms. Aparna Singhal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Ms. Shweta Jain, Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv.

Æ ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.5 SECTION IVB

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. The appellant(s) will deposit the entire amount due as on today with the learned Additional District Judge, Patiala within a period of three months from today and on such deposit the respondents-claimants would be at liberty to withdraw the entire amount on furnishing the Bank Guarantee or immovable property security to the satisfaction of the appellant. The amount, if any, already deposited by the appellant shall be given credit to.

(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RAJINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER