The State Of Uttarakhand vs. Tribhuwan
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Not Reached / Adjourned
Before:
Hon'ble Dipankar Datta, Hon'ble Manmohan
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
28 Jan 2025
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
170310/2022,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.15 SECTION X
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 29139/2022
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-03-2022 in SPA No. 467/2021 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital]
THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
KEDAR RAM ARYA Respondent(s)
(WITH IA No. 148746/2022 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING AND IA No. 148747/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
WITH
SLP(C) No. 19318/2022 (X) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 163067/2022 AND FOR APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT ON IA 163069/2022 AND IA No. 163069/2022 - APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT AND IA No. 163067/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
SLP(C) No. 21869/2022 (X) (FOR APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/ OTHER DOCUMENT ON IA 170310/2022 AND IA No. 170310/2022 - APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT)
SLP(C) No. 21868/2022 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)
Date : 28-01-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Abhishek Atrey, AOR |
|---|---|
| Dr. Abhishek Atrey, Adv. | |
| Mr. Ajay Bahuguna, Adv. | |
| Ms. Ambika Atrey, Adv. | |
| Ms. Jyoti Verma, Adv. | |
| Mr. Navneet Gupta, Adv. | |
| Mr. Jatinder Kumar Sethi, D.A.G. | |
| Ms. Suveni Bhagat, AOR | |
For Respondent(s) Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi, AOR
Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Adv. Ms. Charanjeet Sidhu, Adv. Ms. Mallika, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. Delay condoned.
2. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere with the judgment and order passed by High Court; hence, the special leave petitions stand dismissed. 3. We, however, make it clear that the impugned judgment shall not be treated as a precedent while deciding cases in future. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)