Tensile Steel Ltd vs. Heirs And Legal Representatives Of Deceased Punjabhai Adarbhai Solanki
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. RAJIV KALRA
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12409/2019
PUNJAB AND MAHARASHTRA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
HEIRS AND LRS OF DECEASED PUNJABHAI ADARBHAI SOLANKI AND DHULABHAI PUNJABHAI SOLANKI AND ORS. Respondent(s)
Date : 30-01-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today.
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta,Adv. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Ravindra Sadanand Chingale, AOR | |
| For Respondent(s) |
Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR Ms. Monisha Handa,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R
The office report indicates that vakalatnama filed by learned counsel for sole petitioner is defective. Learned counsel shall within a period of two weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said vakalatnama.
Ld. Counsel for respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 8, and 10 to 12 have not filed any counter affidavit despite grant of last chance. Service of notice is complete qua respondent Nos.2, 9 and 13
but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
As per postal tracking report, notice issued to respondent Nos. 15 and 16 could not be served and returned back undelivered. Hence, learned counsel for petitioners shall, within a period of two weeks, file fresh particulars of the said respondents and shall take requisite steps for the service of notice upon them.
In office report there is no reference regarding status of respondent No.14. Concerned official has to submit his/her explanation as to why the status of said respondent is not reflected in the office report.
List again on 31.3.2020.
RAJIV KALRA Registrar
MG