The Village Panchayat Of Top, Taluka Hatkanangale, District Kolhapur, Maharashtra vs. The State Of Maharashtra Collectorate Represented By Collector Of Kolhapur

COURT NO.2 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 8360/2015 VERSUS

RAJEEV G. & ANR $Respondent(s)$ (with appln. (s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal.)

with

ITEM NO. $18+47$

UNION OF INDIA

C.A. D. No. 38901 of 2014 (With appln. for leave to appeal $u/s$ 31(1) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 and office report)

Date: 20/04/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

For Appellant(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG, Mr. R.Balasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Avijit Bhattacharjee, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

These petitions for grant of leave to appeal are delayed by 606 and 569 days for which no cogent explanation is forthcoming from the appellants. That apart no substantial question of law of Signature Not Verified <table><tbody>Signer ral/public importance arises for our consideration.State 2016 A1 21Research 10315 ONE</tbody>

$\mathbf{1}$

Appellant(s) $A$

The prayer for leave to appeal is accordingly declined and the applications for leave to appeal dismissed on the ground of limitation and also on merits.

(Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) Court Master Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL No. D 8360 OF 2015

UNION OF INDIA ... Appellant(s)

Versus

RAJEEV G. & ANR. ... Respondent(s) With

Civil Appeal No. D 38901 of 2014

O R D E R

These petitions for grant of leave to appeal are delayed by 606 and 569 days for which no cogent explanation is forthcoming from the appellants. That apart no substantial question of law of general/public importance arises for our consideration.

The prayer for leave to appeal is accordingly declined and the applications for leave to appeal dismissed on the ground of limitation and also on merits.

...................J. (T.S.THAKUR)

...................J. (R.BANUMATHI)

New Delhi, April 20, 2015.