Abdul Rahman vs. State Of Karnataka
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Listed On:
7 Apr 2018
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Order Text
ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.4 SECTION IV-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C No(s). 28571-28595/2014
N.P. SUGANDHINI ETC. ETC. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH SLP(C) No. 7918-7951/2015 (IV-A) (Office report on default)
Date : 30-07-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL [IN CHAMBER]
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. S. N. Bhat, AOR |
|---|---|
| Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, AOR | |
| For Respondent(s) | Ms. Anitha Shenoy, AOR |
| Mr. Anand Sanjay M.Nuli,Adv.<br>Mr. Dharm Singh,Adv.<br>Mr. Nanda Kumar K.B.,Adv.<br>M/S.<br>Nuli & Nuli, AOR | |
| Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that M. Shekar Shetty, R.No.1 in SLP(C)Nos. 7918-7920/2015, SLP(C)Nos. 7921- 7932/2015, SLP(C)Nos. 7933-7946/2015 and SLP(C)Nos. 7951 of 2015; Umesh, R.No. 13 in SLP(C)Nos. 7918-7920/2015, R.No. 14 in Digitally signed by MADHU BALA Date: 2018.07.31 15:57:08 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
SLP(C)Nos. 7921-7932/2015, R.No.2 in SLP(C)Nos. 7948-7949 of 2015 and R.No.29 in SLP(C)Nos. 7933-7946/2015 are unserved but Respondent Nos. 2,13,14 and 29 were supporting the case of the petitioner(s).
The name of Umesh, R.No. 13 in SLP(C)Nos. 7918-7920/2015, R.No. 14 in SLP(C)Nos. 7921-7932/205, R-2 in SLP(C)Nos. 7948-7949 of 2015 and R.No.29 in SLP(C)Nos. 7933-7946/2015 is deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioner(s).
As far as the name of M. Shekar Shetty, R.No. 1 in SLP(C)Nos. 7918-7920/2015, 7921-7932/2015, SLP(C)Nos. 7933- 7946/2015 and SLP(C)Nos. 7951 of 2015 is concerned, learned counsel states that in the connected matters, the said respondent has been served at the same address. Let fresh notice be issued to R.No.1.
Dasti in addition is permitted.
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) further prays and is granted two weeks' time to furnish fresh addresses of unserved respondent R.No.38 – Mangalaiah in SLP(C)No. 7918-7920 of 2015.
(MADHU BALA) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order