Maharashtra Academy Of Engineering And Educational Research Pune Through Its Executive President And Managing Trustee Prof. Dr. Vishanath D. Karad vs. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.64
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36261/2015
MAHARASHTRA ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH PUNE Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and <pre>interim relief and office report)</pre> WTTH SLP(C) No. 17587-17588/2016 Office Report)
Date: 08/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, Adv. Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Adv. Mr. Aman Shukla, Adv. $M/s. K. J. John & Co., Adv.$
For Respondent(s) Ms. Akansha Ghose, Adv. Mrs. Suchitra Atul Chitale, Adv. Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Adv. Mr. Aman Shukla, Adv. $M/s.$ K. J. John & Co., Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
SLP(C) No. $36261/2015$
The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Prashant Kenjale, appearing on behalf of Mr. Nishanth Katneshwarkar, Advocate-on-Record Signature Not Verified $\frac{1}{1014} \frac{1}{1014} \frac{1}{1014} \frac{1}{1014} \frac{1}{1014}$ Date: 2016-09<br>17:20:57 IST<br>Reason: $\frac{1}{2}$ vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks' time.
None appears for respondent Nos.2 to 6, despite due service.
Respondent No.7 has already filed the counter affidavit.
Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent No.8 for filing counter affidavit.
SLP(C) No. 17587/2016
Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.1, 5, 7 and 8 for filing counter affidavit.
None appears for respondent Nos.2 to 4 and 6, despite due service.
SLP(C) No. 17588/2016
Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.1, 5 and 7 for filing counter affidavit.
None appears for respondent No.2, despite due service.
Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No.3 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.
Respondent Nos.4 and 6 are common in SLP(C) No. 17587/2016 in which they have been served, as such, their service in the present matter is also deemed to be complete but none appears on their behalf.
List again on 21.11.2016.
(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar