Maharashtra Academy Of Engineering And Educational Research Pune Through Its Executive President And Managing Trustee Prof. Dr. Vishanath D. Karad vs. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:8 Sept 2016
CNR:SCIN010333742015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.64

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 36261/2015

MAHARASHTRA ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH PUNE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and <pre>interim relief and office report)</pre> WTTH SLP(C) No. 17587-17588/2016 Office Report)

Date: 08/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, Adv. Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Adv. Mr. Aman Shukla, Adv. $M/s. K. J. John & Co., Adv.$

For Respondent(s) Ms. Akansha Ghose, Adv. Mrs. Suchitra Atul Chitale, Adv. Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Adv. Mr. Aman Shukla, Adv. $M/s.$ K. J. John & Co., Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

SLP(C) No. $36261/2015$

The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Prashant Kenjale, appearing on behalf of Mr. Nishanth Katneshwarkar, Advocate-on-Record Signature Not Verified $\frac{1}{1014} \frac{1}{1014} \frac{1}{1014} \frac{1}{1014} \frac{1}{1014}$ Date: 2016-09<br>17:20:57 IST<br>Reason: $\frac{1}{2}$ vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks' time.

None appears for respondent Nos.2 to 6, despite due service.

Respondent No.7 has already filed the counter affidavit.

Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent No.8 for filing counter affidavit.

SLP(C) No. 17587/2016

Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.1, 5, 7 and 8 for filing counter affidavit.

None appears for respondent Nos.2 to 4 and 6, despite due service.

SLP(C) No. 17588/2016

Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.1, 5 and 7 for filing counter affidavit.

None appears for respondent No.2, despite due service.

Fresh steps to be taken for service of respondent No.3 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.

Respondent Nos.4 and 6 are common in SLP(C) No. 17587/2016 in which they have been served, as such, their service in the present matter is also deemed to be complete but none appears on their behalf.

List again on 21.11.2016.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(22) - 28 Feb 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 7 Nov 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 30 Sept 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 2 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 17 Apr 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 13 Apr 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 17 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 17 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 13 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 13 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 21 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 21 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 8 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(10) - 8 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 13 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 13 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 5 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 5 Jul 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(6) - 5 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 8 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 8 Jan 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 8 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data