Maharashtra Academy Of Engineering And Educational Research Pune Through Its Executive President And Managing Trustee Prof. Dr. Vishanath D. Karad vs. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
¼ITEM NO.39 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17587-17588/2016 ESTELLE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MAHARASHTRA ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, PUNE & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report) Date : 17/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Adv. M/s. K. J. John & Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Tanvi Kakar, Adv. Mrs. Suchitra Atul Chitale,Adv. Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.17587/2016 Respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. None appears for respondent Nos.2 to 4 and 6, despite due service. Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent Nos.5, 7 and 8 have not filed counter affidavit. Further opportunity is declined. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready. SLP(C) No.17588/2016 Respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. Item No.39 -2- None appears for respondent Nos.3, 4 and 6, despite due service. Last opportunity is granted to the Ld. Advocate, Ms.Shubhada Phaltankar, appearing on behalf of Mr.Nishanth R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate-on-Record for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.2 within four weeks' time. Respondent Nos.5 and 7 to file counter affidavit within the same period. Registry to process both the matters for listing before the Hon'ble Court immediately after the expiry of the period of four weeks, irrespective of the fact whether vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of the above-said respondents are filed or not, as further opportunity is deemed to be declined. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL)
Registrar