Vineet Dhanda vs. Unionof India Ministry Of Home Affairs Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
28 Oct 2013
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| ITEM NO.12 | COURT NO.1 | SECTION PIL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E C O U R T O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A | ||
| Writ Petition(s)(Civil) | No(s).<br>931/2013 | ||
| VINEET DHANDA | Petitioner(s) | ||
| VERSUS | |||
| U.O.I & ORS | Respondent(s) | ||
| (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T.) | |||
| Date : 01/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. | |||
| CORAM : | |||
| HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | |||
| For Petitioner(s) | Dr.<br>J. P. Dhanda,Adv.<br>Ms.<br>Raj Rani Dhanda, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Vineet Dhanda, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>N.A. Usrani, Adv. | ||
| UOI | For Respondent(s) | Mr. P.S. Narasimha, ASG<br>Ms. B. Sunita Rao, Adv.<br>Mr.Ranjeet Kumar, Adv. | |
| Kerala | Mr. Liz Mathew, Adv.<br>Mr. M.F. Philip, Adv.<br>Mr. Shriya Raj Chauhan, Adv. | ||
| Uttrakhanad | Mr. Mukesh Giri, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhishek Attrey, Adv.<br>Mr. Aishveryan Shandily,Adv. | ||
| Puducherry | Mr. V.G. Pragasam, Adv.<br>Mr. S.J. Aristotle, Adv.<br>Mr. Praburamasubramanian, Adv. | ||
| Bihar<br>Signature Not Verified | |||
| Digitally signed by<br>Pardeep Kumar | Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv. | ||
| Date: 2014.09.02<br>17:29:17 SAST<br>Reason: | Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adv. | ||
| Punjab | Mr. Sanchar Anand, Adv.<br>Mr. Piyush Hans, Adv.<br>Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv.<br>2 | ||
| MP | Mr. Naveen Sharma, Adv.<br>Ms. Swati B. Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Adv. | ||
| Tamil Nadu | Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, Adv. |
Mr. Santh Kumaran, Adv. Ms. Vanita C. Giri, Adv. Gujarat Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv. Ms. Jesal, Adv. Ms. Preeti Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Puja Singh, Adv. Goa Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Adv. Mr. Annirudh Sharma, Adv. Mizoram Mr. Pragyan Sharma, Adv Ms. H. Kajira, Adv. Sikkim Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv.for M/s. Arputham Aruna & Co. Assam Ms. Vartika Sahay, Adv. For M/s. Corporate Law Group Haryana Mr. Manjit Singh, Sr. Adv. Ms. Vivekta Singh, Adv. Ms. Nupur Choudhary, Adv. for Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. HP Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv. MP Mr. Musharaft Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Ayesha Choudhary, Adv. Mr. C.D.Singh, Adv. Nagaland Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Adv. Chhattisgarh Mr. C.D. Singh, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Kakkar, Adv. Jharkhand Mr. Krishnanand Pandey, Adv. West Bengal Mr. Anip Sachthey, Adv. Mr. Mohit Paul, Adv. Manipur Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Adv. 3 Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur,Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R According to Office Report, service is incomplete on respondent Nos. 1,2,3,5,9,18,28 and 30. Advocate-on-record for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps for service on the unserved respondents, returnable in ten weeks. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted.
(PARDEEP KUMAR) AR-cum-PS
(RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER