Sanjay Jhunjhunwalla vs. The State Of Meghalaya Represented By The Chief Secretary

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Adarsh Kumar Goel
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:1 Apr 2016
CNR:SCIN010332702015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

3 Oct 2015

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.58 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28599/2015 MARUF ELAHI THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to delete respondent from array of party and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 28659/2015 SLP(C) No. 28686/2015 SLP(C) No. 28714/2015 SLP(C) No. 28717/2015 SLP(C) No. 28718/2015 SLP(C) No. 28724/2015 SLP(C) No. 28725/2015 SLP(C) No. 28726/2015 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 01/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Ms.Upma Shrivastava,adv. Mr. Avijit Bhattacharjee,Adv. Mr.Manoj Joshi,Adv. Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. Ms.Apeksha Sharan,Adv. Mr. Sunny Choudhary,Adv. For Respondent(s) Signature Not Verified Mr. Avijit Bhattacharjee,Adv. Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2016.04.02 10:45:17 TLT Reason: Mr.A.Henry,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Mehta,Adv. Rishi Matoliya,Adv. ..........2 ITEM NO.58 -2- SC 28599/2015 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) Nos. 28599 & 28686/2015

Four weeks time as last chance is given to the appearing

respondents to file the counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to all the unserved respondents. SLP(C) No. 28714, 28717 & 28659/2015 Service is complete. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondents to file the counter affidavit. SLP(C) No. 28718/2015 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the appearing respondents to file the counter affidavit. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 10.02.2016 of this Court in respect of all the unserved respondents. SLP(C) No. 28724/2015 & 28725/2015 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the appearing respondents to file the counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the respondent No.31 within four weeks.

Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

..........3 ITEM NO.58 -3- SC 28599/2015

SLP(C) No. 28726/2015 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the appearing respondents to file the counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has already filed the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice issued to the unserved respondents which is defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of

three weeks rectify the defects whatever have been found in it. List the matter again on 29.06.2016.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

SB

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(93) - 14 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(92) - 19 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(91) - 8 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(89) - 27 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(90) - 27 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(86) - 14 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(87) - 14 Feb 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(88) - 14 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(84) - 30 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(85) - 30 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(81) - 13 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(82) - 13 Jan 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(83) - 13 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(78) - 29 Nov 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(79) - 29 Nov 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(80) - 29 Nov 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(76) - 28 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(77) - 28 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(73) - 20 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(74) - 20 Sept 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(75) - 20 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(70) - 14 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(71) - 14 Sept 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(72) - 14 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(66) - 9 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(67) - 9 Sept 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(68) - 9 Sept 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(69) - 9 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(64) - 5 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(65) - 5 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(62) - 2 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(63) - 2 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(59) - 8 Aug 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(60) - 8 Aug 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(61) - 8 Aug 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(54) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(55) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(56) - 12 Jul 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(57) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(58) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(48) - 29 Jun 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(49) - 29 Jun 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(50) - 29 Jun 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(51) - 29 Jun 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(52) - 29 Jun 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(53) - 29 Jun 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(46) - 9 May 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(47) - 9 May 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(43) - 22 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(44) - 22 Apr 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(45) - 22 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(37) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(38) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 1 Apr 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(40) - 1 Apr 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(41) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(42) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(34) - 10 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(35) - 10 Mar 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(36) - 10 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(28) - 10 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(29) - 10 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 10 Feb 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 10 Feb 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(32) - 10 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 10 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(21) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 7 Dec 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(23) - 7 Dec 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(24) - 7 Dec 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(27) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 13 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(17) - 13 Oct 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(18) - 13 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 9 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 9 Oct 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(15) - 9 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(11) - 8 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 8 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 6 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 6 Oct 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 6 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 5 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 5 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 5 Oct 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(6) - 5 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 5 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 1 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 1 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data