Dileep Kumar Pandey vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
In a Special Leave Petition concerning a service matter, the Supreme Court granted the petitioner an additional week to file a rejoinder affidavit. This procedural order reflects the court's commitment to ensuring all parties have an adequate opportunity to present their case, delaying a substantive hearing but advancing the litigation process.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Respondent's Counsel
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
This order arises from a Special Leave Petition (Civil) filed by Dileep Kumar Pandey against the Union of India & Ors., challenging a judgment and order dated July 12, 2010, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The matter was listed for hearing on August 12, 2013, where the Supreme Court, considering a request from the petitioner's side, granted one week to file a rejoinder affidavit.
Timeline of Events
Judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in SA No. 1074/2010.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 7641/2011 filed in the Supreme Court by Dileep Kumar Pandey.
Case called on for hearing in the Supreme Court. Petitioner's counsel circulated a letter requesting time to file a rejoinder affidavit.
Key Factual Findings
A letter was circulated on behalf of the petitioner requesting time.
Source: Current Court Finding
Statutes Applied
Petitioner's Arguments
The arguments are not detailed in this procedural order, but the petitioner's side, through counsel, requested additional time to file a rejoinder affidavit.
Respondent's Arguments
The arguments are not detailed in this procedural order, but the respondent's side was present through counsel.
Court's Reasoning
The Court granted time for filing a rejoinder affidavit based on a 'letter circulated on behalf of the petitioner'. This suggests a request was made and accepted as a procedural necessity.
- Emphasis on Procedural Fairness
Impugned Orders
Specific Directions
- 1.One week time is granted for filing rejoinder affidavit.
- 2.List after one week.
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This is a purely procedural order granting an extension of time, without any discussion or ruling on substantive legal principles. It has no precedential value.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Text
ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7641/2011 (From the judgement and order dated 12/07/2010 in SA No.1074/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) DILEEP KUMAR PANDEY Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) NO. 35751 of 2011 (With office report) Date: 12/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Santanam Swaminadhan, Adv. Mr. Ram Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anand Singh, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs.Rekha Palli, Adv. Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma, Adv. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated on behalf of the petitioner, one week time is granted for filing rejoinder affidavit. List after one week.
´
(NAVEEN KUMAR) (S.S.R. KRISHNA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order