V. Ramachandran vs. The Superintendent Of Police, Ariyalur District -621704

øITEM NO.25 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... CRLMP No. 7590/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/03/2015 in CRLOP No. 11344/2014 passed by the High Court Of Madras) V. RAMACHANDRAN AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ARIYALUR DISTRICT - 621704 AND ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP) Date : 02/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. S. Taliadevan, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar R. S., Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. The impugned order is passed by the High Court in the petition which is filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in which the petitioner had prayed that the respondents be directed to register FIR on the complaint which was given by the petitioner on 29.01.2004 and investigate upon the said compliant and prosecute the 1 SLP CRLMP No. 7590/2016 same. The High Court has noticed that the police has investigated into the matter and recommended the closure of the case on the ground that the dispute was civil in nature. On that basis, the High Court has disposed of the petition. We do not want to interfere with the impugned order. However, it would always be open to the petitioner to file protest petition to the inquiry report which is filed by the police before the Magistrate and impress upon the Magistrate to register the same. As and when the protest petition is filed, the same shall be considered by the trial court in accordance with law. The special leave petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation.

(Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

2