Thittakavi Anantha Padmanabhamoorthy& Ors. vs. C. Balakrshnan(D) Thru Lrs& Ors.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.14
REGISTRAR COURT. 1
SECTION XII
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 30785-30786/2012
THITTAKAVI ANANTHA PADMANABHAMOORTHY &OR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
C. BALAKRSHNAN(D) THRU LRS & ORS.
$\mathtt{Respondent(s)}$
<pre>(with interim relief and office report)</pre>WITH SLP(C) No. $15532/2013$ (With Office Report)
Date : $16/02/2015$ These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Mr G Umapathy, Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Adv. Mr Nikhil Swami, Adv. Mrs. Prabha Swami, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs. Prabha Swami, Adv.
M/s. Mahalakshmi Balaji & Co., Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
SLP(C) NO.30785-786/2012
Proof of dasti has not been filed by the ld. Counsel for ature Not Verified petitioner with respect to respondent Nos. 2 to 4, 9 to $0 , \mathbf{IST}$ 11. Four weeks time is requested to effect service and to file proof thereof.
Item No.14
SLP(C) NO.15532/2013
Among 8 respondents, service of respondent Nos. 4,5,6b and 7 has not been effected. Fresh particulars have already been furnished by the ld. Counsel for the petitioner. Registry verify the same and issue fresh notice.
Legal representatives of deceased respondent no.6, i.e., 6a, 6c and 6d and also respondent No.8 have not entered appearance despite service.
With respect to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 counter affidavit is already on record.
Now, the ld. Counsel, Mr Vijay Kumar has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 alongwith No Objection Certificate but Power of Attorney has not been filed. The same be filed by next date.
List again on 7.4.2015.
(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar