Shini K M vs. The University Of Calicut
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
TTEM NO. $28$
COURT NO.11
SECTION $XT-A$
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).22536-22537/2019
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-08-2019 in WA No. 1989/2018 22-08-2019 in WA No. 2253/2018 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam]
RESHNA A.M. & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT & ORS.
Respondent(s)
(IA No. 18602/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 143741/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
WITH
SLP(C) No. $3045/2020$ (XI-A) (IA No. 240509/2024 - APPLICATION UNDER ORDER V RULE 20 CPC FOR EFFECTING SERVICE THROUGH PUBLICATION IA No. 46617/2022 - DELETING THE NAME OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IA No. 198217/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 218541/2023 - PERMISSION TO RAISE ADDITIONAL QUESTION OF LAW)
SLP(C) No. $28276/2019$ (XI-A) (IA No. 187919/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
SLP(C) No. $6226-6227/2020$ (XI-A) (IA No. 94761/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date: 07-01-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.
$CORAM$ :
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE
For Petitioner(s) Mr. John Mathew, AOR
M/S. Lawyer S Knit & Co, AOR Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr. Dipankar Singh, Adv. (through VC) Ms. Madhusmita Bora, AOR
Mr. Himinder Lal, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. S.P.chaly, Sr. Adv. Mr. Himinder Lal, AOR Mr. Subhash Chandran K.R, AOR Ms. Krishna LR, Adv. Mr. Vipin Nair, AOR Ms. M.b.ramya, Adv. M/S. Lawyer S Knit & Co, AOR Mr. V Chitambaresh, Sr. Adv. Mr. K. Rajeev, AOR Mr. M.F. Philip, Adv. Ms. Purnima Krishna, AOR Mr. C. K. Sasi, AOR Ms. Meena K Poulose, Adv. Mr. Junais Padalath, Adv. * M/S. Lead Counsel, AOR Mr. Kaleeswaram Raj, Adv. Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.a., AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
SLP(C) No. 3045/2020
O R D E R
learned counsel for the petitioner(s) states that he has already served the respondent(s) through paper publication, a proof of which, shall be filed within one week. Needful be done in one week.
SLP(C) No. 28276/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) further submits that some of the unserved respondent(s) having been deleted from the array of parties, need not be served.
2
FURTHER ORDER
List the matters after four weeks.
In the meantime, pleadings in all the matters be
completed.
(NISHA KHULBEY) (MAMTA RAWAT) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
*appearance slip is given