The Union Territory Of Chandigarh Land Acquisition Collector vs. Tej Ram

COURT NO.6

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

I.A. 45-55/2017 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).33907-33917/2016

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/02/2016 in RFA No. 2947/2014 02/02/2016 in RFA No. 2948/2014 02/02/2016 in RFA No. 2949/2014 02/02/2016 in RFA No. 2950/2014 02/02/2016 in RFA No. 2951/2014 02/02/2016 in RFA No. 3048/2014 02/02/2016 in RFA No. 3049/2014 02/02/2016 in RFA No. 3050/2014 02/02/2016 in RFA No. 3404/2014 02/02/2016 in RFA No. 4237/2014 02/02/2016 in RFA No. 5985/2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)

RANGA RAM AND ORS ETC ETC

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ETC. $Respondent(s)$

(Appln(s) for directions and office report)

Date : $24/04/2017$ These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

• For Petitioner(s) Mr. Randeep Singh Surjawala, Adv. Mrs. Varuna Bhandari, Adv. Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv.
• Mr. Sangram S. Saron, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shree Pal Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

These applications are for a direction to the respondent(s) to deposit the amount of compensation, as ordered by the High Court.

Since, there is no stay granted by this Court it is for the applicant(s) to move the Reference Court for execution of the ders passed by the High Court.

We make it clear that the pendency of these special leave petitions shall not stand in the way of the Reference Court in

$\mathbf{1}$

taking steps for execution.

The I.As are, accordingly, disposed of.

(NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR