B. D. Marbaniang vs. J. M. Thangkhiew

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Adarsh Kumar Goel
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:1 Apr 2016
CNR:SCIN010330062015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

30 Sept 2015

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

6 ITEM NO.57 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28386/2015 B.D. MARBANIANG Petitioner(s) VERSUS J.M. THANGKHIEW & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 28470/2015 SLP(C) No. 28480/2015 SLP(C) No. 28519/2015 SLP(C) No. 29379/2015 (With Office Report) Date : 01/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Vandana Sehgal,Adv. Mr. Anirudh Sharma,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Mehta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Upma Shrivastava,Adv. Mr. Avijit Bhattacharjee,Adv. Mr.A.Henry,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Mehta,Adv. Mr.Rishi Matoliya,Adv. Mr. Rishi Malhotra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.28386/2015 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2016.04.02 10:45:51 TLT Reason: Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent Nos.1-4, 7,11, & 12 to file the counter affidavit. .......2 ITEM NO.57 -2- SC28386/2015 Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to respondent Nos.14 & 15. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the respondent No.24 within four weeks. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

SLP(C) No.28470/2015

Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent Nos.1-4, 7,11, & 12 to file the counter affidavit. Registry to issue notice to the respondent Nos.25 & 27 with utmost dispatch. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 10.02.2016 of this Court in respect of the respondent Nos.6,8,16 & 23. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. SLP(C) No. 28480/2015 & SLP(C) No. 28519/2015 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the appearing respondents to file the counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to all the unserved respondents. SLP(C) No. 29379/2015 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent Nos.1-4,5,11 & 12 to file the counter affidavit. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for

the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 10.02.2016 of this Court in respect of the unserved respondents. List the matter again on 29.06.2016.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

SB

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(93) - 14 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(92) - 19 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(91) - 8 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(89) - 27 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(90) - 27 Apr 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(86) - 14 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(87) - 14 Feb 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(88) - 14 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(84) - 30 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(85) - 30 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(81) - 13 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(82) - 13 Jan 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(83) - 13 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(78) - 29 Nov 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(79) - 29 Nov 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(80) - 29 Nov 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(76) - 28 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(77) - 28 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(73) - 20 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(74) - 20 Sept 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(75) - 20 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(70) - 14 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(71) - 14 Sept 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(72) - 14 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(66) - 9 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(67) - 9 Sept 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(68) - 9 Sept 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(69) - 9 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(64) - 5 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(65) - 5 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(62) - 2 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(63) - 2 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(59) - 8 Aug 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(60) - 8 Aug 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(61) - 8 Aug 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(54) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(55) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(56) - 12 Jul 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(57) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(58) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(48) - 29 Jun 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(49) - 29 Jun 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(50) - 29 Jun 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(51) - 29 Jun 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(52) - 29 Jun 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(53) - 29 Jun 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(46) - 9 May 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(47) - 9 May 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(43) - 22 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(44) - 22 Apr 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(45) - 22 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(37) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(38) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 1 Apr 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(40) - 1 Apr 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(41) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(42) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP

Viewing

Order(34) - 10 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(35) - 10 Mar 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(36) - 10 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(28) - 10 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(29) - 10 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 10 Feb 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 10 Feb 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(32) - 10 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 10 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(21) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 7 Dec 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(23) - 7 Dec 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(24) - 7 Dec 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(27) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 13 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(17) - 13 Oct 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(18) - 13 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 9 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 9 Oct 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(15) - 9 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(11) - 8 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 8 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 6 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 6 Oct 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 6 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 5 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 5 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 5 Oct 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(6) - 5 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 5 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 1 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 1 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Search in District Courts Data