All India Council For Technical Education Member Secretary vs. Sultan Ul Uloom Educational Society Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 32973/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-06-2017 in WA No. 782/2017 AND order dated 14-07-2017 in WA No. 943/2017, WA No. 944/2017, WA No. 953/2017 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad For The State Of Telangana And The State Of Andhra Pradesh)
ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SULTAN UL ULOOM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ORS.etc. Respondent(s)
( IA No.115750/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.115751/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 26878-26880/2017 (XII-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.101997/2017-APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO PLACE ON RECORD ADDITIONAL FACTS AND DOCUMENTS) SLP(C) No. 29700/2017 (XII-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) Diary No(s). 34546/2017 (XII-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.112707/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Diary No(s). 34308/2017 (XII-A) ( IA No.112256/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Date : 01-12-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, AOR
Mr. Anil Soni, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey, AOR Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv.
Mr. R. Anand Padmanabhan, Adv.
Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, AOR Digitally signed by ASHWANI KUMAR Date: 2017.12.01 15:41:50 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
For Respondent(s) Mr. Nakul Dewan, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, AOR Mr. C. George Thomas, Adv. Ms. Akriti Chaubey, Adv. Ms. Qurratulian, Adv. Ms. Tanya Shree, Adv.
Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Delay condoned.
No case for interference with the impugned judgment is made out. Accordingly, the Special leave petitions are dismissed. Observations made in the impugned order shall shall not come in the way of the final decision.
Pending application, if any shall stand disposed of.
(NEELAM GULATI) (JAGDISH CHANDER) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER