The Development Commissioner Mepz Special Economic Zone And Heous The Administrative Officer vs. Hospira Health Care India Pvt Ltd Deputy General Manager

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble S. Abdul Nazeer
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:29 Jan 2018
CNR:SCIN010328012017

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

First Hearing

Listed On:

17 Nov 2017

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.39

COURT NO.2

SECTION IV-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 781/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-08-2017 in WP No. 54015/2016 & 54173-54184/2016 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru)

DIRECTOR SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY PARKS OF INDIA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

M/S WIPRO GE HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. & ORS. Respondent $(s)$

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.8924/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.8925/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Date: 29-01-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

For Petitioner(s)Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG<br>Mr. Merusagar Saamantary, Adv.<br>Mr. Anmol Chandan, Adv.<br>Ms. Lhingneivah, Adv.<br>Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR
For Respondent(s)Mr. Tushal Jarwal, Adv.<br>Ms. Vijayalakshmi Menon, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

Learned counsel for the appellants prays for an interim stay ♠ femthe operation of the impugned order. In other words, prayer <sup>^^</sup>for stay of the reimbursement of the amount that would be due pursuant to the impugned order. The amount is not yet quantified. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to stay the operation of the impugned order. The appellant would pay, whatever be the amount due, pursuant to the impugned order to the respondent assessee within four weeks on condition that the respondent assessee furnishes a bank guarantee for the amount that is to be refunded by the appellant.

The contempt proceedings shall remain stayed subject to deposit of the amount within four weeks.

Tag with C.A.No.1942819429/2017.

(OM PARKASH SHARMA) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR CUM PS BRANCH OFFICER

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(11) - 5 Aug 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 27 Nov 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 9 Oct 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 17 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 2 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 11 May 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 27 Apr 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 12 Apr 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 5 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 29 Jan 2018

ROP

Viewing

Order(1) - 17 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view