Delhi Development Authority vs. Gyan Chand

S.P.S. LALER Registrar

$\mathbf{D}$ m

For Petitioner(s)

BAKSHI RAM AND SONS (HUF) & ORS.

Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv. Mr. C P. Rajwar, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chatterjee, Adv.

Date: 11-08-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Gagan Gupta, AOR Mr. Udaibir Singh Kochar, Adv. Mr. Nitin Mishra, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the <pre>Court made the following</pre>

O R D E R

Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3. However, Mr. Nitin Mishra, AOR has appeared on behalf of respondent no. 3. He seeks and is given three weeks time to file the vakalatnama and counter affidavit.

Vakalatnama and counter affidavit filed $\mathbf{on}$ behalf of respondent no. 1 is defective. Two weeks time, is granted to counsel to cure the defects.

List again on 01.09.2022.

ITEM NO.48

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 3566/2022

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

VERSUS

Petitioner(s)

Respondent(s)

SECTION XIV