Union Of India Department Of Telecommunications vs. Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. (Formerly Known As Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Limited And Earlier Known As Sterling Cellular Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
8 Dec 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY
Civil Appeal No(s). 10910-10917/2014
UNION OF INDIA ETC Appellant(s)
VERSUS
VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD AND ORS ETC Respondent(s)
WITH C.A. No. 3675-3680/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in re-filing appeal and appln.(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal. and appln.(s) for c/delay in re-filing appeal and appln.(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal. and )
C.A. No. 3646/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay and appln.(s) for permission to file addl. grounds and appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and appln.(s) for stay and )
Date : 11/08/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s)
Mr Kumar Parimal, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Ms Shivangi Khanna, Adv. Mrs. Suchitra Atul Chitale,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2015.08.19 10:48:24 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr Mansoor Ali Shaket, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. Mr Aditya Narayan Singh, Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan,Adv. Ms Shivangi Khanna, Adv. Mrs. Suchitra Atul Chitale,Adv. Mr Akarsh Garg, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,Adv.
Ms Abhisaar Bairagi, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr Brij Kishor Sah, Adv. M/s. S.m. Jadhav & Company,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
C.A. NO.10910-917/2014
Service is complete except for respondent no.2 in C.A no.10911/2014. Await certificate of service from the Tribunal concerned. Issue reminder.
All the counsels appearing for the served respondents are at liberty to file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks time.
C.A. No. 3675-3680/2015, C.A. No. 3646/2015
All the appearing counsels for the served respondents are at liberty to file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks time, if not already filed.
C.A. No. 3646/2015
With regard to respondent nos. 1 to 4, office report is silent for filing of counter affidavit. If not already filed counter affidavit, liberty is granted to all the counsel appearing for these respondents to file the same within four weeks time.
It appears from the office report that respondent No.5 is common as appellant in C.A. No.10910-917/2014 and whereby he is already represented and accordingly service of
Item No.54
respondent no.5 is deemed to have been accepted as complete service, since he has entered appearance as appellant in the other connected matter.
Respondent no.6 is also common as respondent No.2 in C.A. No.10916/2014 and the said respondent is already represented and therefore service is accepted as service upon the said respondent who is also represented in the connected matter. Service is complete in respect of both respondents.
C.A. No. 3675-3680/2015
Service is complete in respect of respondent no.2 in C.A. No.3678/2015 but none has entered appearance.
Respondent no.1 is at liberty to file counter affidavit, if any, in C.A. No.3677-78/2015 within four weeks time.
For rest of the respondents, certificate of service is still awaited from the Tribunal. Issue reminder.
It appears from the office report that respondent no.1 in C.A. No.3676, 3680 of 2015 is common as respondent No.1 in C.A. No.10916/2014 and whereby representation is already made and therefore, service with regard to these matters are dispensed with and accepted as deemed served.
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in C.A. No.3679/2015 is common as respondent nos. 1 and 2 in C.A. No.10914/2014 and whereby representation is already made and therefore the service is dispensed with and these respondents are deemed served.
Respondent No.3 in C.A. No.3680/2015 is common respondent No.2 in C.A. No.10916/2014 whereby representation already made and therefore, service with regard to these matters are dispensed with and accepted as deemed served.
List again on 29.10.2015.
(SURAJIT DEY) Registrar