Union Of India Department Of Telecommunications vs. Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. (Formerly Known As Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Limited And Earlier Known As Sterling Cellular Limited

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Unknown Judge
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:11 Aug 2015
CNR:SCIN010326172014

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

8 Dec 2014

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY

Civil Appeal No(s). 10910-10917/2014

UNION OF INDIA ETC Appellant(s)

VERSUS

VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD AND ORS ETC Respondent(s)

WITH C.A. No. 3675-3680/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in re-filing appeal and appln.(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal. and appln.(s) for c/delay in re-filing appeal and appln.(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal. and )

C.A. No. 3646/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay and appln.(s) for permission to file addl. grounds and appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and appln.(s) for stay and )

Date : 11/08/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s)

Mr Kumar Parimal, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Ms Shivangi Khanna, Adv. Mrs. Suchitra Atul Chitale,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2015.08.19 10:48:24 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr Mansoor Ali Shaket, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. Mr Aditya Narayan Singh, Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan,Adv. Ms Shivangi Khanna, Adv. Mrs. Suchitra Atul Chitale,Adv. Mr Akarsh Garg, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,Adv.

Ms Abhisaar Bairagi, Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr Brij Kishor Sah, Adv. M/s. S.m. Jadhav & Company,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

C.A. NO.10910-917/2014

Service is complete except for respondent no.2 in C.A no.10911/2014. Await certificate of service from the Tribunal concerned. Issue reminder.

All the counsels appearing for the served respondents are at liberty to file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks time.

C.A. No. 3675-3680/2015, C.A. No. 3646/2015

All the appearing counsels for the served respondents are at liberty to file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks time, if not already filed.

C.A. No. 3646/2015

With regard to respondent nos. 1 to 4, office report is silent for filing of counter affidavit. If not already filed counter affidavit, liberty is granted to all the counsel appearing for these respondents to file the same within four weeks time.

It appears from the office report that respondent No.5 is common as appellant in C.A. No.10910-917/2014 and whereby he is already represented and accordingly service of

Item No.54

respondent no.5 is deemed to have been accepted as complete service, since he has entered appearance as appellant in the other connected matter.

Respondent no.6 is also common as respondent No.2 in C.A. No.10916/2014 and the said respondent is already represented and therefore service is accepted as service upon the said respondent who is also represented in the connected matter. Service is complete in respect of both respondents.

C.A. No. 3675-3680/2015

Service is complete in respect of respondent no.2 in C.A. No.3678/2015 but none has entered appearance.

Respondent no.1 is at liberty to file counter affidavit, if any, in C.A. No.3677-78/2015 within four weeks time.

For rest of the respondents, certificate of service is still awaited from the Tribunal. Issue reminder.

It appears from the office report that respondent no.1 in C.A. No.3676, 3680 of 2015 is common as respondent No.1 in C.A. No.10916/2014 and whereby representation is already made and therefore, service with regard to these matters are dispensed with and accepted as deemed served.

Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in C.A. No.3679/2015 is common as respondent nos. 1 and 2 in C.A. No.10914/2014 and whereby representation is already made and therefore the service is dispensed with and these respondents are deemed served.

Respondent No.3 in C.A. No.3680/2015 is common respondent No.2 in C.A. No.10916/2014 whereby representation already made and therefore, service with regard to these matters are dispensed with and accepted as deemed served.

List again on 29.10.2015.

(SURAJIT DEY) Registrar

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(36) - 3 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(37) - 3 Feb 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(38) - 3 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(33) - 12 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(34) - 12 Jan 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(35) - 12 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(30) - 17 Nov 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(31) - 17 Nov 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(32) - 17 Nov 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(27) - 26 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 26 Sept 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 26 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 25 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 25 Jul 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 25 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 5 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 5 May 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 5 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 7 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 7 Apr 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 7 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 22 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 22 Jan 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 22 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 29 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 29 Oct 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 29 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 11 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 11 Aug 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 11 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(7) - 10 Apr 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 10 Apr 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 18 Dec 2014

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 18 Dec 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 12 Dec 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 12 Dec 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 8 Dec 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 8 Dec 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data