Parimal Dey vs. Anita Agarwal

ITEM NO.50

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28176/2015

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13/08/2015 in CO No. 2914/2015 passed by the High Court Of Calcutta)

PARIMAL DEY

VERSUS

WINSOME PLAZA PVT. LTD. & ORS.

(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and <pre>office report)</pre>

WITH

SLP(C) No. $28209/2015$ (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. $28207/2015$ (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned judgment and Office Report)

Date: 30/10/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

$CORAM :$

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Sr.Adv. Mr. Dibakar Bhattacharjee, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Pandit, Adv. Mr. Tavish B. Prasad, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Kanchan Yadav, Adv.

For M/s. Victor Moses & Associates, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, these matters are adjourned for four weeks

COURT NO.10

$Respondent(s)$

Petitioner(s)

for filing rejoinder affidavit.

COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.

[INDU POKHRIYAL] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR]