Penmetsa Bhaskara Peddi Raju vs. Kalidindi Venkata Narasayamma (Died ) By Lrs

ITEM NO.37

COURT NO.5 $\mathbf{5}$

SECTION XII-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21533/2022 (@ D.No.32567/2022)

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-05-2022 in AS No. 410/2005 passed by the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh At Amravati)

PENMETSA BHASKARA PEDDI RAJU

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

KALIDINDI VENKATA NARASAYAMMA (DIED ) BY LRS. Respondent $(s)$

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.169168/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.169169/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )

Date: 25-11-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prakhar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Anil Gaur, Adv. Ms. Anu Gupta, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Delay condoned.

There are concurrent findings of fact recorded by both the courts below against the petitioner while refusing to pass the decree for specific performance for the agreement to sell. Cogent Signally stored Stons have been given on readiness and willingness on the part of njay Kumat<br>te: $2032 - 1125$ 16484<mark>0%</mark>e plaintiff. The findings of readiness and willingness are against the plaintiff and thereafter the decree for specific performance is denied.

We see no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court in exercise of our powers under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.

The special leave petition stands dismissed accordingly.

Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(SANJAY KUMAR-II) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR