Jitendra Singh Parmar vs. State Of Rajasthan

SECTIONXV

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1668 OF 2012

MAHESH CHAND SAINI ...APPELLANT

VERSUS

STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS

OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT

The matter abovementioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 11.11.2014, when the following order was passed:

"The learned counsel for the appellant shall file the fresh particulars of the respondent No. 6 within a period of three weeks' and he shall also take appropriate steps for the service of notice to him within the same period.

The Learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 seeks and is given four weeks' time to file the counter affidavit. List again on 22.1.2015."

It is submitted that counsel for the Appellant has not furnished the fresh address of the unserved respondent No. 6. Therefore, the matter was again listed before Ld. Registrar's Court on 11.02.2015 and lastly on 21.04.2015, when the following Order was passed:

"The office report indicates that although by order dated 11.2.2015 of this Court three weeks time, as last chance was given to the learned counsel for the appellant to comply with the terms of the order of this Court dated 11.11.2014 of the Court, yet he has done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter."

It is further submitted that Counsel for the Appellant has neither filed fresh particulars of respondent No. 6 nor taken any steps for service on the unserved respondent No. 6 so far.

Hence, the default of the Advocate is reported to the Hon'ble JudgeinChambers for orders.

Dated this the 16th day of May, 2016.

Copy to : 1. Mr. Debasis Misra, Adv. Ch. No. 80, Supreme Court of India

2. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. 69, Lawyers Chamber, SCI, New Delhi110001

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR