The State Of Uttarakhand State Of Uttarakhand Through Secretary Energy vs. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. Through Its Managing Director

Ä ITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).26877/2012 M/S GVK L & T CONSORIUM & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S RELIANCE INFRAS.LTD.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report ) WITH SLP(C) NO.37250/2012 Date: 20/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Himanshu Shekhar,Adv. Mr Arpit Shukla, Adv. M/s Fox Mandal & Co., Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr Arpit Shukla, Adv. M/S Fox Mandal & Co. ,Adv Mr Himanshu Shekhar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO.26877/2012 No counter affidavit has come on record on behalf of respondent no.1 (as same has not been filed within the time permissible under the rules). The ld. Counsel on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 4 has submitted that counter affidavit on their behalf has been filed on 19.3.2013. Office to ascertain and report accordingly. -2- Item No.36 Respondent No.5 is reported to be duly served through dasti but none appeared nor any steps taken on his behalf. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when the other connected matter would become ready. SLP(C) NO.37250/2012 Respondent Nos 1 and 5 are granted three weeks' time as final chance for filing counter affidavit. On behalf of respondent no.2, the ld. Counsel has made a submission at Bar that vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit has been filed yesterday only. Office to ascertain and verify. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are reported to be duly served but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. List again on 25.4.2013.

hj