The State Of Uttarakhand State Of Uttarakhand Through Secretary Energy vs. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. Through Its Managing Director

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Rohinton Fali Nariman
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:12 Feb 2013
CNR:SCIN010324572012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

7 Nov 2012

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

0 ITEM NO.43 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16303/2012 M/S GVK & L & T CONSORTIUM & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RELIANCE INFRAS.LTD.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) NO. 26877 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 37250 of 2012 (With office report) Date: 12/02/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Mandal, Adv. Ms. Anisha Singh, Adv. M/S Fox Mandal & Co. Ms. Gargi B. Bharali, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Anisha Singh, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Mandal, Adv. M/S Fox Mandal & Co. ,Adv Mr. Utsav Trivedi, Adv. M/S. Parekh & Co. ,Adv Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.16303/2012 No further steps required, as counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 has already been filed on record. Item No.43 -2- The learned counsel for respondent No.5 has submitted at Bar that she does not wish to file any counter affidavit. Further necessary orders, as per rules, shall be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. SLP(C) No.26877/2012 Respondent No.1 has failed to file counter affidavit within the time granted by the Court. On behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 4, the learned Advocate, Ms. Sangeeta Mandal has undertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by the next date. Four weeks' time is granted. Respondent No.5 is reported to be duly and properly served but none appeared nor any steps have been taken on his behalf. SLP(C) No.37250/2012 The learned counsel for the petitioner has made a submission at Bar that necessary steps against respondent No.3 has been already taken. Remaining duly represented respondents are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. List again on 20.3.2013. | | | (M.A. SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR | |rd | | |

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(19) - 10 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 30 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 30 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 15 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 15 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 12 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 12 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 1 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 17 Dec 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 9 May 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 25 Apr 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 20 Mar 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(7) - 12 Feb 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(6) - 9 Jan 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 3 Dec 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 30 Nov 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 9 Nov 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 17 Sept 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 11 May 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view