The State Of Uttarakhand State Of Uttarakhand Through Secretary Energy vs. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. Through Its Managing Director

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Rohinton Fali Nariman
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:9 Jan 2013
CNR:SCIN010324572012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

7 Nov 2012

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

þ ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16303/2012 M/S GVK & L & T CONSORTIUM & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RELIANCE INFRAS.LTD.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) NO. 26877 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 37250 of 2012 (With office report) Date: 09/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Umesh Pratap Singh, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. Mr. Pranav Vyas, Adv. M/S Fox Mandal & Co. Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Pranav Vyas, Adv. M/S Fox Mandal & Co. ,Adv Mr. Utsav Trivedi, Adv. M/S. Parekh & Co. ,Adv Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.16303/2012 The learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 has Item No.50 -2 submitted at Bar that counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 4 has already been filed on record and during the course of the day, he would be filing counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.3. As pointed out in the earlier order, the learned counsel for respondent No.5 does not wish to file any counter affidavit on record. Office to file clear report in respect of respondent No.3 so as to facilitate this Court to pass necessary orders. SLP(C) No.26877/2012 Three weeks' time is granted to respondent No.1, as final chance, for filing counter affidavit. The learned counsel has made a submission at Bar that he would be filing vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 4 by the next date. Respondent No.5 is reported to be duly and properly served through dasti but none appeared. SLP(C) No.37250/2012

Respondent No.1 to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit within three weeks. Respondent No.5 is granted three weeks' time for filing counter affidavit on record.

Item No.50 -3-

The learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps against respondent Nos.2 to 4. Notices be issued through the concerned District Court as well as through dasti. List all the matters on 12.2.2013.

| | | (M.A. SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR | | | | |

rd

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(19) - 10 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 30 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 30 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 15 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 15 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 12 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 12 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 1 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 17 Dec 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 9 May 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 25 Apr 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 20 Mar 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(7) - 12 Feb 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 9 Jan 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(5) - 3 Dec 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 30 Nov 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 9 Nov 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 17 Sept 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 11 May 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view