The State Of Uttarakhand State Of Uttarakhand Through Secretary Energy vs. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. Through Its Managing Director

Ì ITEM NO.53 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16303/2012 M/S GVK & L & T CONSORTIUM & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RELIANCE INFRAS.LTD.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) NO. 26877 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 30/11/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Lal Pratap Singh, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Pranav Vyas, Adv. M/S Fox Mandal & Co. ,Adv Mr. Utsav Trivedi, Adv. M/S. Parekh & Co. ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.16303/2012 Respondent No.1 has already filed counter affidavit on record. The learned Advocate, Mr. Pranav Vyas, appearing on behalf of M/s. Fox Mandal & Co. has undertaken to file Item No.53 -2 vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.4 by the next date. Granted. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are granted final chance for filing counter affidavit. The learned counsel for respondent No.5 has submitted at Bar that he does not wish to file any counter affidavit, as he is supporting the petitioner. SLP(C) No.26877/2012 Respondent No.1 is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Fresh steps for getting the notice served against respondent Nos.2 to 5 be taken. Notices be issued by dasti as well as through concerned District Court. List again on 9.1.2013. | | | (M.A. SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR | | | | |

rd