Surjit Kaur vs. The State Of Punjab

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:5 May 2025
CNR:SCIN010323722023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

After Week/Month/Vacation

Before:

Hon'ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, Hon'ble Ahsanuddin Amanullah

Stage:

DIRECTION MATTERS

Remarks:

Not taken up/ Not Today

Listed On:

8 Jan 2024

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 11786/2025

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-12-2019 in RFA No. 2921/2007 07-12-2019 in RFA No. 2922/2007 07-12-2019 in RFA No. 2925/2007 07-12-2019 in RFA No. 2927/2007 07-12-2019 in RFA No. 2929/2007 07-12-2019 in RFA No. 2930/2007 07-12-2019 in RFA No. 2934/2007 07-12-2019 in RFA No. 2935/2007 07-12-2019 in RFA No. 2936/2007 07-12-2019 in RFA No. 5498/2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh]

MAJOR SINGH & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No. 107716/2025 - APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT, IA No. 107715/2025 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION, IA No. 107718/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING, IA No. 107720/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) AND IA No. 107717/2025 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT)

Date : 05-05-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN

For Petitioner(s) :

Mr. Arvind Gupta, AOR Mr. Surinder Singh, Adv. Mr. Mohit Bidhuri, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. The application for substitution is allowed after condoning the delay and setting aside abatement. Digitally signed by DEEPAK SINGH Date: 2025.05.06 Signature Not Verified

2. Permission to file special leave petition is granted. 17:07:08 IST

3. Delay condoned.

Reason:

4. Issue notice.

5. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.

6. In addition to the usual mode, liberty is granted to the petitioner to serve notice through the Standing Counsel for the respondent/State.

7. Tag with Diary No. 8659 of 2021.

8. In the event the petitioners succeed, they would not be entitled to interest for the delayed period.

(DEEPAK SINGH) (PREETI SAXENA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(16) - 5 May 2025

ROP

Viewing

Order(15) - 19 Jan 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 9 Oct 2023

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 22 Sept 2023

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 6 Sept 2023

ROP

Click to view

Order(11) - 25 Aug 2023

ROP

Click to view

Order(10) - 22 Aug 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 1 Aug 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 9 Feb 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 7 Nov 2022

ROP

Click to view

Order(6) - 10 Oct 2022

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 16 Sept 2022

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 2 Sept 2022

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 18 Aug 2022

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 4 Mar 2022

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 25 Feb 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data