Gram Panchayat Taraf Behbal Bahadar vs. State Of Punjab
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
à ITEM NO.4 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25614/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 26920/2010 SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 26/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Mr.Shish Pal Laler,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr.Jasdeep Singh Dhillon,Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv. Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Harsh Vardhan Jha,Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Signature Not Verified Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2016.04.27 10:25:40 TLT Reason: Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. ..........2 ITEM NO.4 -2- SC25614/2010
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) No.27490/2010
The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
SLP(C) No.8111/2013 The respondent No.4 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 has already filed the vakalatnama and counter affidavit which are defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks rectify the defects whatever have been found in them. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. SLP(C) No.34114/2011 Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the respondent No.2 and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. List the matters again on 19.07.2016. SLP(C) Nos.25614, 26920/2010 & 36770/2014 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take appropriate steps in the respect of the unserved respondents in all matters despite opportunities given. Therefore, these matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for
further directions. Await orders and list thereafter.
Registrar
(M V RAMESH)
SB