Gram Panchayat Taraf Behbal Bahadar vs. State Of Punjab
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
% ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.13 SECTIO N IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 4/2014, I.A. No. 5/2014, I.A. No. 6/2014, I.A. 7/2015, I.A. 8/2015, I.A. 9/2015, I.A. 1/2015, I.A. 2/2015, I.A. 3/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26787/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/04/2010 in CWP No. 6954/1996 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) FAQIR CHAND & ORS. Petit ioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respo ndent(s) (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T.) Date : 09/09/2015 These I.As. were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tanuj Bagga Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K. K. Mahalik, Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R An application has been filed seeking cond onation of delay in filing application for substitution for bringing on record the Lrs. of Petitioner No. 14. The delay has Signature Not Verified sufficiently been explained. Delay is condoned. Digitally signed by Sarita Purohit Date: 2015.09.17 An application has been filed for substitution of Lrs. of 13:37:45 IST Reason: Petitioner No. 14 who died on 11th December, 20 11 leaving behind the Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application. The application is allowed. The names of Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application be substituted in place of deceased Petitioner No. 14. An application is filed seeking condonation of delay in filing substitution application of Petitioner No. 27. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay is condoned.
An application has been filed for substitution of Lrs. of Petitioner No. 27 who died on 13 th December, 2010 leaving behind the Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application. There is no opposition. The application is allowed. The names of Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application be substituted in place of deceased Petitioner No. 27 An application has been filed seeking condonation of delay in filing substitution application of deceased Respondent No. 19. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay is condoned. An application has been filed for substitution of Lrs of Respondent No. 19 who died on 13th June, 1997 leaving behind the Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application. The application seeking substitution is allowed. The names of Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application be substituted in place of deceased Respondent No. 19. Delay of 3491 days in bringing on record Lrs. of Respondent No. 6 is condoned. An application has been filed for substitution of Lrs of Respondent No. 6 who died on 6 th October, 2000 leaving behind the Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 2 of the application. Application is allowed. The names of Lrs. mentioned in paragraph 2 of the application be substituted in place of deceased Respondent No. 6. Amended cause title be filed within three weeks f rom today.
(RASHI GUPTA) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Sr.P.A. COURT MASTER